The referees make mistakes and, no, it’s not the chatter of an angry fan. It’s not victimization, it’s a clear “no”, without alibi, a severe and honest rebuke from their boss. He says Gianluca RocchiCan manager (National Referees Commission): “Satisfied with the refereeing on the last day? No”. No buts, no buts.
Uniformity of judgment? Impossible
Rocchi seeks if not justification, at least an explanation, on the uniformity of judgment, a supernatural concept: do not say homogeneity in vain. It is a desire, a utopia, one asks, one invokes, but it is impossible: “Every referee has a thinking head and a philosophy. It is clear that the ideal would be to have 100% uniformity but it is impossible, because we are human beings We can discuss the interpretation for weeks, but let’s not forget that football is also subjectivity behind every decision.”
Var on call
Of course, accepting banal mistakes is more difficult to accept in the VAR era: Roma protested (foul on Baldanzi in the match against Monza), but the penalties in Juventus-Cagliari and Fiorentina-Milan were discussed.
Rocchi opens up to the challenge, the football version of the hawk’s eye in tennis, which could be requested by a team’s technical staff. Italy had proposed for the experimentation: “VAR on call and actual time? These are proposals which are being evaluated. Certainly VAR on call is an alternative solution, it could be a complementary solution to help the referee find a correct solution”.
Wastes of time
Another problem: wasting time, prolonged player fainting when a team is winning. Rocchi again. “The actual time? We are doing important work on time losses, painstaking work to anticipate the resumption of the game. The possible introduction of the actual time would certainly lead to a major upheaval, but everyone would play the same minutes.”
#Rocchi #satisfied #latest #refereeing #VAR #called #solution
–
