PAOK: “Lucescu did not spit” – AEK’s objection to Lamela in the apology –

Apologized to the Super League’s Primary Single Member Disciplinary Body, PAOK and AEK for what happened at the end of the derby of the 8th matchday.

The coach of the Northern Biceps Razvan Lucescuthe group’s caregivers Kyriakos Yantsidis, You are happy Kaltabanidis and the Lamella with him Daniel Vegathe Union’s technical director, are at risk of being banned from the playing field and the dressing room from 15 calendar days to 6 months and a fine.

THE PAOK argued that the incidents took a bigger dimension than they should and the AEK side that there is only a verbal confrontation while an objection was filed for the summons of Lamela.

Read about it: AEK – PAOK: In the apology of Lucescu-Lamela, disciplinary action against the Dikefalus of the North

PAOK’s lawyer Achilles Black-faced stated among other things that Lucescu and Vega did not push each other and with Lamela that there is only a verbal confrontation caused by the AEK player. “This year in terms of attitudes is excellent. Obviously there will be some tensions. Here a greater dimension was given than it should be except for the gesture of Yantsidis who will apologize. It was given more weight than it should be, we exaggerated a story. Lucescu is only accused of the incidents with Vega and Lamela. There is an incorrect entry on the match sheet, it says that Lucescu and Vega were pushed, which is not true.” said Mavrommatis, who added: “I have video from a sports fan that was posted online. Observers are human, some things are not spelled correctly. As soon as the match ends, Lucescu is calm, suddenly someone approaches him and says something to him, he disagrees, there is only a verbal confrontation”.

At this point, the sports judge told PAOK’s lawyer to advise Razvan Lucescu to calm down: “Tell the coach to calm down, it’s a shame. Let’s not get to the point where the match is decided on paper. It’s up to you, the coach must be calm, cool and not create issues.”

Ah. Mavrommatis went on to say that “Lucescu has no physical contact with anyone. He walks calmly and talks to his players, he goes to his players, he is approached by an AEK player who says something to him and angers him. AEK fans curse him. We ask for his release.”

On the Lamela – Lucescu episode in the locker room, he said: “I got the official video from the locker room, check it out. Lamela holds something in his hands and throws it in his face. Lucescu doesn’t spit on him. He’s obviously saying something, but he’s not being blamed for it. He told us she told him “shame on you”. In case it is considered that he did something, consider that the act is justified after what has gone before.”

The specific incident caused the “explosion” of the seat. “Totally unacceptable to both of us. If it wasn’t for the other people to move them away they would have been crushed. If there was no police cordon, things would be worse.”

For him caregiver Kaltabanidis who is reported to have “moved furiously” was said to… “What position do the MAT have in the locker room? 2-3 PAE people have been blocked, there is tension, pushing and shoving and he is trying to get in to free our people, he is trying to open up space. He’s trying to get our people out of there. If it is judged that he has done it, we ask for leniency because he has been in PAE for 10 years and has not done anything”. The specific claim did not convince the president who, after seeing the video, said. “No, he is trying to attack the AEK team. Watch the video.”

For him caregiver Yantsidis which has been written that he showed the two middle fingers of his hands on the platform, from the side of PAOK it was said that “The incident happened, we agree. He made the gesture and we apologize.”

“It would be a waste”

The president of the Disciplinary Body was in favor of the squad’s presence in the locker room. “If it wasn’t a platoon it would be a disaster. I too would order the platoon down. In the end, we will report the police officers as defendants.”

Her lawyer PAE AEK Alexis Alexiou filed an objection to the call Lamella who is in danger of being banned for two matches: “For Lamela we object to the call because he could only be punished if he had been sent off or if he had been mentioned on the match sheet. There is no suspension, no mention on the match sheet, he must be cleared. Nothing happens between them, with Lucescu. There is a verbal attack on Lamela, there is no Lamela-Lucescu fight, at least that’s what I’ve seen. Nothing is visible in the video. He holds nothing in his hands, and if there is anything, it cannot cause anything. I don’t understand how these reports are compiled. We ask for his release.”

For the Lucescu – Vega episode earlier: “There is no contact between them. Lucescu enters the pitch, does what he does, they say something to each other but there is no physical contact. Another person is pushing Loucescu, from PAOK. Vega goes towards Lucescu, reaches three meters, goes to talk to him, Lucescu doesn’t even listen to what he says. There is not even physical contact, confrontation something would be said. The two benches in the dressing room had to be withdrawn at the final whistle. We should ask the reason only to Lucescu who, instead of going to the locker room, stayed on the playing field and provoked.”

The decision will be announced within the day.

Read also

Football night: Where to watch the matches Panathinaikos – Chelsea, PAOK – Plzen and Malmö – Olympiacos

Alonso: “We respect Chelsea but we are not afraid of them, we have the potential to win”