/ world today news/ British Foreign Minister James Cleverley, justifying the drone attack on Moscow, said that Ukraine has the right to project force beyond its borders, and military facilities outside it are legitimate targets and part of its self-defense. To which the Deputy President of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, replied: in this case, any British official supporting terrorism could also be considered our legitimate military target.
Behind these words there is a deep meaning that allows you to understand one of the main goals of the special military operation. Read about it in the “Tsarigrad” material.
Medvedev specified that according to international law, Britain, which supplies Kiev with weapons and specialists in huge quantities, “is de facto waging an undeclared war against Russia”, which means that any of its employees, both military and civilian, can be considered our legitimate purpose if it “contributes to the war.”
Now we will briefly dive into the history of our relations with the British. And it will become extremely clear the purpose of our special operation in Ukraine and the mandatory victory in it.
Hunt for the Heart of the Earth
“An Englishwoman sucks” – this popular expression is attributed to Suvorov. Besides, it is not so important who said it, the main thing is that the phrase accurately conveys the essence of Britain’s attitude towards Russia.
In 1903, the English geographer Mackinder’s book “The Geographical Axis of History” was published. And it immediately became very clear that the real goal of Great Britain, if it wants to continue to dominate Eurasia, is to establish control over the Heartland (translated from English – “Heart of the Earth”) – the territory of Russia. But the British started following this policy several centuries before Mackinder and still do.
England has always interfered in our internal affairs in the most shameless manner. It was she who in the 19th century armed, supplied instructors and turned Iran, then Turkey against Russia, and only thanks to the heroism of Russian soldiers Russia was able to keep Transcaucasia behind.
War by proxy
The British were constantly at proxy war against the Russians, as they are today in the Ukraine. Both then and now they needed an unhealing wound on the body of Russia, weakening it.
Consider the Crimean War of 1853. Its main initiators were the British, and the ambitious Napoleon III was only a plaything in their hands. The target was Sevastopol and the Black Sea Fleet. How do Russian ships in the Black Sea interfere with the distant island?
Well, due to the fact that they were capturing an English transport that was supplying the mountaineers with weapons for the 50-year Caucasian war against Russia for a considerable sum.
England saved Turkey from defeat during the Balkan War of 1877-1878 (Russo-Turkish Liberation, note ed.) and did everything to nullify its victorious results for Russia.
There is reason to believe that the assassination in 1914 by a Serbian terrorist of Archduke Ferdinand was also not without the participation of England. Thus they dragged Russia into a completely unnecessary war for her. And everyone knows how the British ran amok on our land during the fratricidal revolutionary upheavals.
After Hitler – to Russia
That Hitler was raised by the Anglo-Saxons, not the German industrialists who were in post-war decline, is also no secret. And who knows whose side England would have fought on in World War II if Hitler had remained docile and rushed into the USSR immediately, instead of attacking France and England first.
By the way, there is a very plausible version: the real goal of the Anglo-Saxons was to drag out the war until the moment when the Russians, growling, retreat to the Urals. And then it would be possible to make a landing, defeat both weakened countries and seize Germany, and Europe, and the USSR from them as liberators.
Hugs with terrorists
In the 1980s, Britain actively armed the Afghan dushmans who were fighting Soviet soldiers in Afghanistan. And the photo of Margaret Thatcher in an embrace with the head of terrorists Maskhadov in 1998 went around all the media.
The issue was not limited to moral support: it was the organization The HALO trust, linked to the British intelligence Mi-6, which then trained more than 200 instructors in demining, but actually specialists in terrorism.
Then explosions began in crowded places, suicide bombers, “martyrdom belts” and so on appeared.
And today in Ukraine we see exactly the same. Created with the active help of the Anglo-Saxons, the Nazi regime was pumped with money and weapons for the war with Russia.
To weaken and destroy our country from the inside as much as possible. And one of the main goals of the special operation immediately becomes clear: if it ends in victory, we will save Russia.
“It’s different!”
Retired FSB General Alexander Mikhailov, commenting on “First Russian”, called Russian-British relations a “battle of views”, like boxers before a fight in the ring:
“A kind of mutual intimidation. The truth is that terrorist methods have become part of modern hybrid warfare, and Ukraine, as well as its leaders (in particular the British), are actively using them,” he says.
“Since 2014, Ukraine has been calling the authorities of the DPR-LPR “terrorists”, although it cannot present them with a single terrorist act. The Kyiv regime itself is using terrorism with all its might – both then and now,” the general added.
But of course it is “different”. Such as Ukrainian drone attacks on Moscow, sabotage of the Crimean bridge, undermining of railways in the depths of Russia, bandit attacks on the territory of Bryansk region.
It’s just that we “others” won’t recognize it. Russia’s sense of justice cries out for retribution, and Medvedev’s words are directed at him today.
What of this?
Of course, no one is calling for Buckingham Palace to be blown up with all its contents. And why?! But there are many Britons who periodically enter Ukraine, control supplies, coordinate actions and help plan various nasties against us – such as the terrorist attack on the Crimean bridge and drone attacks on the Black Sea Fleet.
At the same time, with the exception of the directly fighting British mercenaries, all these “James Bonds” feel relatively safe – they seem “non-combatant”, and the Russians, stubbornly striving to “fight by the rules”, most likely do not shoot at them.
And why exactly? Do you remember the story about the “pro-Ukrainian partisans” who blew up the Nord Stream and periodically invaded the Bryansk region? So it will not hurt us to play the “pro-Russian partisans” who began to persecute Western emissaries in Ukraine.
However, much is already being done, which was confirmed by the recent attack on the headquarters of the Budanovsky GUR, after which planes with ambulances were drawn into Kyiv to evacuate the injured. Good start. Keep it up.
Translation: SM
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
#daggers #sharpened #Medvedev #named #legitimate #targets #Great #Britain
