/ world in the present day information/ The assault is the perfect protection, in keeping with the administrators on the BAS, they blended science with their non-public firms and NGOs
A recording of a tv interview final week with Prof. Antoineta Hristova, director of the BAS Institute for Inhabitants and Human Analysis, unexpectedly appeared within the media yesterday. Naturally, the primary questions in it have been additionally associated to the BGN 378,000 undertaking for psychotests for drivers, gained by the institute beneath the operational program for transport and transport infrastructure. And for the truth that among the many contractors on the undertaking are Hristova herself and the PhD scholar on the institute, Kalina Krumova – a former deputy from “Ataka”, now an advisor to Minister Valentin Radev within the Ministry of the Inside. I’ve not researched the problem of this contract, so I cannot dispute Hristova’s claims that Krumova was extraordinarily competent and that the undertaking was extraordinarily necessary. It might be so, this undertaking is already abundantly coated by all of the media.
DUMA, nevertheless, on June 12 this 12 months (“Two administrators at BAS combine science with their non-public firms”) raised a very totally different drawback, which, in our opinion, is not any much less socially necessary. The issue is whether or not heads of items within the BAS, funded by the treasury, can have non-public firms and NGOs during which they siphon assets, scientific outcomes and folks from public institutes, receiving on the similar time a wage from all of us, the Bulgarian taxpayers. The query is affordable, as a result of Antoaneta Hristova and Kalina Krumova, in keeping with a reference in “Apis”, on July 4, 2017, registered their non-public NGO “Institute for Politics”, during which the director of the educational institute is the chairman of the Administration Board, and Krumova is his member. Folks from the institute educate on the NGO, not exterior their working hours and doubtless not for nothing. On the web site of the NGO itself, it’s written that it cooperates with the BAS and with… the Hristova Institute. I.e. the woman cooperates with herself – just like the one from the joke who was speaking to himself and when requested what he was doing, he mentioned: I’m speaking to a wise particular person. That is what’s scandalous. As a result of it’s a hidden diversion of a public useful resource into non-public arms. And Hristova is the only proprietor of the corporate “Goal-AMG” EOOD. Nonetheless, the professor complained to the TV presenter that he was a sufferer of “manipulation and scandalous solutions”. Years in the past, she threatened the journalists who wrote in regards to the outrage on the College of Perniški, the place she was vice-rector.
Within the interview, Hristova said that the BAS doesn’t work in keeping with the Regulation on Administration, the place in Article 19 it’s written that heads of establishments established by regulation (such because the BAS) can’t be members of the administration of an NGO, firm or cooperative . Clearly, we must always guess that the BAS doesn’t work beneath the Regulation on the Prevention of Battle of Curiosity, the place in Artwork. 10 says, generally, the identical. The Academy, you see, labored beneath the BAS Regulation. Forgive me, professor, however it’s this regulation that stipulates that the BAS carries out its actions primarily based on the Statute adopted by the Common Meeting. And this very Statute of the BAS in Artwork. 74 prohibits the administrators of institutes from being members of administration boards of “business firms and the like”. From clear to clear, what sort of insinuation are you right here! We can not pay them a wage to work privately. However apparently Prof. Hristova is appearing in keeping with the well-known precept: when you find yourself as much as your neck in filth, assault. And assault overtly to get away.
As for Hristova’s dispute with the presenter, is there a query within the parliament as regards to her undertaking for drivers, the DUMA discovered that there’s a query – it’s to Minister Krasimir Valchev from the left MPs Veska Nencheva and Stoyan Mirchev, however it’s about how and in what methods standards, the non-public NGO of Hristova has gained one other undertaking – for 158,402 euros beneath the “Erasmus +” program.
The second director of an institute engaged on behalf of the institute with its personal non-public firms, about whom DUMA wrote on June 12, is Prof. Hristomir Branzov, head of NIMH. Sure, sure to the identical NIMH, protesting that the BAS doesn’t give it sufficient cash. I’ve been intently following the issues of the BAS for a few years and have all the time defended the scientists who’ve been subjected to monetary genocide by the authorities for practically 10 years. BAS was the establishment within the nation that Simeon Dyankov hit hardest by reducing cash. BAS is the establishment whose subsidy (i.e. salaries and circumstances for doing science) is 20 and 30 instances decrease than that of associated scientific organizations in Western Europe, however Bulgarian scientists are obliged to work on the similar degree as their Western counterparts colleagues as a result of they’re collectively in the identical tasks. From the BAS, brains most actively circulation via Terminal 2, and per capita we’re already on the backside of the EU by way of the variety of researchers. However… The rise within the subsidy for NIMH for 2018 is BGN 1.1 million, and its prices are growing by BGN 700 thousand, i.e. they need to even be coated on prime. And the director Brunzov can be speaking to himself (3 non-public firms and one NGO, with parallel exercise to the institute), however the administration of the BAS has turned a blind eye, by no means thoughts that your complete academy is resentful.
Effectively, are we speaking about insinuations or an “umbrella” over outrages and assaults primarily based on the precept “offense is the perfect protection”?
#cheeky #View #Data
