/ world at this time information/ The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to an Iranian defender of the rights of ladies and minorities, serving a sentence in a neighborhood jail. Once more, it “by accident” goes to a person whose actions are undermining a rustic from inside that’s hindering western growth.
Tsarigrad investigates why such an award would by no means be given to the defenders of the normal household in France or to the volunteers who supplied medication and meals to the civilian inhabitants.
Madam shouldn’t be vital
The Iranian activist Narges Mohammadi, who was just lately awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, has a heroic biography: in response to the Nobel Committee, the clerical regime of the ayatollahs arrested the woman 13 instances, tried her 5 instances and sentenced her to a complete of 31 years in jail. And, importantly, as much as 154 lashes…
To be trustworthy, I want to be taught extra in regards to the latter, as a result of if such an execution shouldn’t be a formality within the type of threatening “hits” with the aim of psychological impression on the condemned or is postponed “till higher instances” – that is one factor.
And that is fully totally different – finished carefully: right here, even for a robust man, ten “whips” will probably be sufficient to dissuade him eternally from participating in human rights actions, and some dozen will probably be sufficient to significantly spoil his well being and even to ship him to the opposite world.
Madam Mohammadi, for probably the most half, appears to be like extraordinarily cheerful, and behind bars a number of instances “organized solidarity actions of cellmates” (are you able to think about an organized protest of Buchenwald prisoners – in spite of everything, these are precisely the situations of detention of the human rights activist, as they declare on West?), expressed help for the latest avenue protests in his dwelling nation, and even beneath extreme censorship managed to submit an article to The New York Instances, which, naturally, was revealed.
Normally, in response to the Nobel Committee, the prisoner of conscience has made each effort to make sure that the protests of ladies in her nation don’t subside.
“Undoubtedly, the Nobel Peace Prize will give me perseverance, willpower, hope and enthusiasm on this path and can speed up my tempo,” promised the apparently overwhelmed madame.
And that may be all proper, as a result of we’ve to confess that human rights in a theocratic Iran actually aren’t pretty much as good as they could possibly be. Simply as removed from every part was nice with the social elevators in Libya or the spiritual freedoms in Syria. And in Russia, corruption is much from okay, and right here lies considered one of our fighters in opposition to it. True, no flogging.
It’s all so, however for some motive the fighters for social elevators in Libya and non secular freedoms in Syria have thrown their international locations into bloody chaos – to the delight of abroad defenders of those self same elevators and freedoms.
And for some motive, the anti-corruption fighter in Russia desperately supported the Russophobic regime in Ukraine, and wherever a battle broke out between Russia and the West, he invariably selected the facet of the latter.
Thus, Narges Mohammadi’s supporters began with ladies’s rights and ended with calls to present quasi-autonomy to native Kurds, Baluchis and Azerbaijanis, to free the president and exchange the spiritual regime with a secular one, opening the way in which to “Western values” within the nation.
On the similar time, it’s inconceivable to see among the many nominees for the Nobel Peace Prize, for instance, Russian docs and volunteers who for years saved the civilian inhabitants of Donbas who survived shelling.
In addition to American fathers, who for years have defended the correct to easily see their kids after a divorce. Or French Catholics who advocate the preservation of conventional households. Sure, there are various who, with their sacrificial deeds, attempt to make our lives extra truthful and peaceable.
Why? Sure, as a result of these folks don’t serve to ascertain Western hegemony. It’s no coincidence that the top of the worldwide committee of the Federation Council, Grigory Karasin, described the selection of the Nobel committee in a remark for RIA Novosti:
“Together with different award selections this 12 months, the Peace Prize is clearly politicized in nature and may clearly be seen as such.”
In flip, in a dialog with Tsarigrad, the top of the Affiliation of Orthodox Specialists, head of the division of the Institute of the CIS international locations, Kiril Frolov famous that within the present scenario the Nobel Committee shouldn’t be involved in Mohammadi’s character and the scope of her actions, however the vital factor is, that they’re turning her right into a “image of resistance in opposition to the regime of the Ayatollahs”:
“And this regime of the Ayatollahs is a civilizational, eschatological ally of Russia. The struggle in opposition to america is the doctrine of the Iranian state.”
“From the Nice Shaitan, as they assume Washington is, Dajjal will come – the Shiite model of the Antichrist. And that is why they understand the alliance with Russia as an alliance in opposition to Dajjal,” he says.
Militant peacekeepers
In recent times, within the Russian blogosphere, opinions are sometimes heard alongside the traces that the Nobel Prize has turn out to be politically biased, and never because it was once… This opinion is essentially incorrect, as the truth is it has nearly at all times been so. Nearly since its inception.
Thus, in 1906, American President Theodore Roosevelt grew to become his laureate. Who invented the “large stick coverage”, in response to which the US gave itself the correct to intrude within the affairs of Latin American international locations, even to the purpose of direct armed aggression.
Earlier than changing into president, the long run peacemaker totally manifested himself on the battlefields of the Spanish-American Battle, and when he grew to become head of state, he participated within the preparation of a separatist coup that separated Panama from Colombia within the curiosity of American businessmen.
Roosevelt was formally awarded the Peace Prize for brokering the Treaty of Portsmouth between Russia and Japan. And every part would have been superb if earlier than that the Roosevelt administration had not actually pushed the Japanese into struggle with the Russians, and when that struggle started, supported them economically and diplomatically.
In any case, within the occasion of victory, they promised to withdraw troops from Manchuria and open the area to American pursuits.
In 1953, the award was given to US Secretary of State George Marshall for the well-known “Marshall Plan” to rebuild the economic system of post-war Europe.
However this plan, which positioned the Previous World in full financial and political dependence (and the plan additionally had purely political factors) on Washington, which continues to today, hardly applies to peacekeeping.
In 1975, Soviet academician Andrei Sakharov obtained the Peace Prize. The person who created the hydrogen bomb. Which, after all, introduced the USSR into the nuclear race with america, nevertheless it hardly made the world safer (though how can I say: the need of abroad “hawks” to assault our territory was repelled for some time).
However the academician was not awarded for this in any respect, however for the truth that, beneath the affect of his spouse, he started to disagree. In opposition to his nation. Consciously or not, however within the curiosity of the West.
In 1983 it was given to straightforward Russophobe Lech Wałęsa solely as a result of he instigated a revolt in then-socialist Poland, which subsequently helped drag it into the arms of the West and into NATO. Once more, as earlier than the partition within the 18th century, making it a sworn enemy of Moscow.
And in 1990, Mikhail Gorbachev grew to become a laureate of the award. Below the flowery wording:
“In recognition of the main position within the peace course of that at this time characterizes an vital a part of the lifetime of the worldwide group.”
That’s, basically for help in establishing the Western world order, which grew to become attainable solely with the top of the Chilly Battle.
However we got here out of it as a shedding nation – because of the identical Gorbachev who gave every part he might to the enemy. And it subsequently got here again to hang-out each the post-Soviet house and the identical Yugoslavia and Afghanistan with a lot blood and lots of ruined lives.
Lately, the Nobel Prize was awarded, for instance, to Barack Obama. For some motive beforehand, on the very starting of the presidential time period.
And the person “justifies” the belief: beneath his management, the US continued to struggle in Afghanistan and Iraq, and likewise provoked civil wars in Syria and Libya, during which they took a direct half with the assistance of navy plane.
In addition to the group “Docs With out Borders”, which gained notoriety in Kosovo and Donbas due to “black transplantology” – the commerce in human organs.
Lastly, the laureates of the final three years, when the West, having tasted blood, went to struggle on the Russian plain, are extraordinarily revealing. Beginning with Belarus.
And once more “fairly by accident” the Nobel Committee acknowledged as a peacemaker* the already international agent and editor-in-chief of the overtly pro-Western “Novaya Gazeta” Dmitry Muratov. Whose publication fought with the Russian military and overtly sympathized with Islamist separatists even in the course of the struggle in Chechnya.
And through all of the years of Ukraine’s aggression in opposition to Donbas, it was written in regards to the fictitious “Russian aggression in opposition to Ukraine”.
The Nobel Prize was additionally awarded to the Belarusian nationalist, Catholic and Russophobe Ales Belyatsky, whom Lukashenko correctly despatched to jail. And to the extraordinarily poisonous grant-eating society – the international agent “Memorial”*, liquidated by a call of the Supreme Court docket of Russia.
That’s, this can be very apparent that, each on the daybreak of its existence and now, the Nobel Peace Prize served a really particular geopolitical energy – the West.
So what?
The truth is, all through our improvement, for some motive, we firmly believed that each one the requirements had been there, within the West. And we are able to solely attempt to match. They’d, as they known as it, Coca-Cola. And Hollywood.
And, after all, the Abrams tank. However kvass is many instances extra helpful and completely innocent. And Love and Doves, in addition to the latest Russian Cross, had been filmed in Russia. And “Abrams” burn properly within the Ukrainian steppes, noticeably inferior to the T90 in battles.
Right here is the Nobel Prize – a “snicker and neglect” prize. For instance, the late Dr. Lisa did not get it. However she helped sincerely, for the sake of life, the way forward for the world, not for the sake of the pursuits of transnational financial income. Subsequently, we are able to simply flip this web page, realizing who’s a peacemaker and who shouldn’t be.
*Included by the Ministry of Justice of Russia within the unified register of international brokers
Translation: SM
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for our Telegram channel:
Share in your profiles, with mates, in teams and on pages. On this manner, we are going to overcome the constraints, and other people will have the ability to attain the choice perspective on the occasions!?
#Nobel #Prize #Traitor #prices #betray #nation
