Court docket revokes suspension in favor of Agustín Raphael Case

Mexico Metropolis. A federal courtroom revoked the suspension {that a} choose granted to Agustín Caso Raphael, which ordered the supervisory physique to maintain him within the place of Particular Efficiency auditor.

In a unprecedented distant session, the judges of the Fifth Collegiate Court docket on Administrative Issues in Mexico Metropolis declared the criticism attraction filed by the Superior Audit Workplace of the Federation (ASF) to problem the precautionary measure.

He challenged the provisional suspension {that a} federal choose granted to Agustín Caso Raphael, which orders the supervisory physique to maintain him within the place of Particular Efficiency Auditor. The case was referred to a collegiate courtroom on administrative issues, which within the coming days will decide whether or not to substantiate, modify or revoke the primary occasion ruling.

In April Raphael Case was dismissed by auditor David Colmenares, after the audit on the cancellation of the New Mexico Metropolis Worldwide Airport was introduced and after acknowledging earlier than deputies that the Audit dropped from the 2022 Public Account, the analysis of academic coverage.

At the moment, Caso Raphael introduced that it will file “the mandatory authorized treatments within the face of an arbitrary and unlawful determination.”

The previous official filed the request for defense on Might 2 earlier than the Sixth District Court docket in Administrative Issues, the place he challenged the official letter UGA/DGRH/DRL/045/2024, by which the cessation of the rights of his appointment was communicated. .

Choose Francisco Javier Rebolledo admitted the demand for ensures to be processed and granted the suspension, for the reason that letter, he stated on the time, shouldn’t be motivated, as a result of the explanations for the lack of confidence that gave rise to it should not defined. upon termination.

Nevertheless, this Monday, magistrates María Elena Rosas López, Liliana Hernández Paniagua and Jorge Antonio Cruz Ramos decided that the previous official’s arguments had been ineffective, relating to the truth that it’s a matter associated to work as a result of he’s a trusted worker, in addition to as that the complainant lacks standing to file the amparo lawsuit, “since no hurt or hurt is brought on imminently and the act complained of shouldn’t be of an administrative nature.”

Choose Cruz Ramos identified that the entire above shouldn’t be associated to the admission of the declare or the supply through which the requested provisional suspension is granted.

“Alternatively, the 2 criticism assets filed relating to the granting of the precautionary measure that was granted to the complaining social gathering are proposed to be well-founded since within the case, other than addressing the authorized figures of the looks of excellent legislation and “the hazard within the delay have to be complied with public order and social curiosity, which within the case doesn’t happen, for the reason that requested workplace informs him of the cessation of his capabilities as a consequence of lack of confidence within the Superior Audit of the Federation” added the Justice of the Peace.