Both “introverts” and “extroverts” don’t like to be “alone” all the time, but sometimes they get tired of being alone. “Go out and meet people” or is it Ambivert, Omnivert?
To what extent are these two descriptions of personality different or scientifically accurate? Maybe it’s time to use new words “ambivert” and “omnivert”.
Many years ago most people ask the people around them. People I’ve just met Or someone who is a “talker” status saying that she is “Extrovert” or “Introvert” (Introvert) to the extent that there is a personality tag in almost all of her -all online dating apps But many of us can’t say we’re one or the other.
Sometimes we like to go out and socialize with friends. He likes sports and likes to meet new people or new activities, which is a characteristic of people. “outside”
But sometimes I need time to be alone and not go out for long periods, and that is the nature of “Introversion” These things happen both in personal and work life. So that we can’t tell what kind of person we really are?
When talking about personality types “It’s a continuum that goes from introverted to extroverted,” says Northwestern University psychology professor Dan P .McAdams and Will “It’s a bell-shaped curve,” says William Dunlop, author of ‘The Person: A New Introduction to Personality Psychology’. . which most of us find ourselves in the middle of. ”
There are actually two lesser-known personality types: “Ambiverts” or “Ambiverts” were first proposed by Edward S. Conklin, an American psychologist in 1923, referring to introverted and introverted personality traits mixed with while another word is “Omniverts,” which varies between introverted and extroverted behaviorSimply put, an ambivert is a combination, but an omnivert is the true alternation between two personality types.
“This language is an adaptation of popular culture,” said Professor Luke Smillie, a psychologist at the University of Melbourne in Australia. So we came up with these other categories for the psychological characteristics that are central. ”
While the concept of ambivert has been studied and appears in the psychological literature, the word omnivert appears to be a modern psychological construct. And some experts are skeptical about its authenticity.
“From my experience it doesn’t really exist. (Omnivert) – (I don’t believe) anyone can move between these two extremes,” said Professor Richard Robins from the University of California, Davis a special situation.”
“And being a very introverted person in another situation. What I don’t think is possible is for someone to be in hundreds of different situations. and often acts as an extrovert or very introverted in difficult situations. He is never in the middle,” he said.
Ambivert, a controversial concept?
Over the years there is a popular personality test or indicator. ‘Myers-Briggs’ (Myers-Briggs) or something called ‘MBTI’ which is widely used around the world. either in the workplace or in an educational institution People are divided into categories based on their personality scores on different dimensions such as INFJ, ENFP, ESTP, ISFJ, and many others.
The test was first published in 1975, causing words like ‘Extraversion’ and ‘Introversion’ to spread throughout society. Although both terms were first coined by Swiss psychologist Carl Jung in the early 1900s,
The reason is that it has an attractive charm. “When you get signs of character, And know that there are people like you out there. It makes you feel like you’re part of the team,” said Professor Maddams, the combination of letters It makes you feel unique. or different from others too
“People used to be so desperate to understand themselves,” says Scott Barry Kaufman, a cognitive scientist at Columbia University in New York. and the founder of the Center for Human Potential said, “The more you can tell people who they are, It makes them feel more confident in this uncertain world.”
But the surprising thing is ‘There is no scientific validity to prove ‘Myers-Briggs’ “Research in personality psychology consistently shows that psychological changes do not follow that kind of logic or reason,” said Professor McAdams, but measurements such as output and others are essentially continuous. And people are at different points on that continuum. He sees them as traits rather than personality types.
“Since the 1980s, the (scientific) evidence has started to accumulate that people are different at some level,” Professor Smiley said, however, that model has continued to attract many laymen. “We turn to these definite ways of thinking. Because it makes a complex world simpler,” he said.
Myers-Briggs Company They themselves are not aware of events around them. (Environmental factors that influence personality) and some psychologists do that.
“These traits (both extroverts and introverts) still exist And most people are somewhere in the middle, so the word ‘ambivert’ is useful,” says Professor John Zelenski, psychologist at Carlenton University in Ottawa. “We are not always the same person in different situations. Most people are flexible in this way. Being very introverted is often a sign of mental illness.” (He meant that a person who is extremely introverted all the time could be mentally ill at some point.)
Although these characteristics are genetically predictable, But it can change at any time. This is especially true as people get older. “It’s nature and nurture. But nature keeps it going,” Professor McAdams said.
The dangers of personality labeling
Although each type of personality has its own advantages and disadvantages, in the same way, personal characteristics But this is not necessary for example, research shows that people have more control over the bring out and ambivert their feelings than people inside.
While another study found, although it was introverts and extroverts Ambiverts prefer to talk about texting, but Ambivert prefers texting. Additionally, Research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2023 found that people often judge Extraverts to be a worse listener than someone who is not Extraverted.
But these different features are often overlooked. This is one of the possible dangers of being too attached to these categories. This makes it easy to misinterpret someone’s behavior. “Intervention is often misclassified as being long. or low interest in others Including very low motivation to participate in society,” said Professor Smiley.
In the same way “Outside. They are often mistaken for being more talented. Just because they are more talkative and seem to have different topics to talk about,” he said.
But surprisingly, the main components of Extraverted personality is not the ability to be in social communication. Rather, it is reward-seeking behavior. to gain social status or social attention
Cuffman explains that attention to external cues appears to be stimulated by dopamine in the brain’s reward circuitry. which encourages more exploration and social participation. On the contrary, introverts will not get much reward from these social experiences.
Another misconception is that people who score as they are produced tend to be naturally social. But research results show that That’s out. Introverts are better at connecting with others because they mimic the behavior of the people they interact with.
“Extroversion is sometimes equated with social skills. But we found that people who extrapolate will be involved in more unconscious reporting,” said Corrina Duffy, a research scientist at the University of Colorado. Anschutz Medical Campus said.
At the same time It has long been believed that extroverts themselves are excellent leaders of business organizations. But new research suggests that other personality types with their own unique strengths can do the same.
The things that can make a difference in the eyes of employees are: A leader’s ability to create intellectual stimulation. and commitment from colleagues that are more associated with introverted personalities. As researchers said
“People often think that people are in a position of extreme power,” said Professor Robbins, but that is not always the case. Truth be told “Transference is less related to successful life outcomes than other personality traits such as conscientiousness.”
Adam Grant, an organizational psychologist from the University of Pennsylvania Note of course “Who is more productive, invisible or introvert?” “Naturally, They both engage in flexible speaking and listening styles.” “Obscure Benefit”
meet halfway
In some ways, people with these different personality traits have several things in common For example, despite being extroverts. High but still feeling tired from socializing Research shows that It may take a long time to feel that tired.
“We can all identify with situations that bring out the deepest aspects of ourselves and others and bend them to a ball,” says Cuffman. outside to be inside us. ”
Sometimes, you can take yourself out of your comfort zone to bring out new mental abilities and benefits more extreme Their mood improved.
“People who identify themselves as introverts often experience many positive emotions. When they behave in a way that extroverts do,” said Zelensky. It was as if the true Tan had been revealed. ”
It doesn’t matter what your natural personality traits are. Build your behavioral flexibility and adaptability Including the ability to change certain traits up or down in response to different situations, Professor Smiley says this may be the best way to live life.
Researched and edited by Witit Borompichaichartkul
Origin
