Home » News » They soaked Zaluzhni with the help of the “senseless massacre” at Krinki – 2024-03-16 02:21:02

They soaked Zaluzhni with the help of the “senseless massacre” at Krinki – 2024-03-16 02:21:02

/View.info/ “Senseless massacre”. Ukrainian propagandists themselves give this assessment of what is happening at the Paddarm created by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the left bank of the Dnieper. They believe that the command has abandoned its soldiers to certain death. However, there are reasons to believe that these statements by the media of the Kyiv regime do not have much connection with the actual military events.

In recent weeks, the “establishment of a bridgehead by the Ukrainian Armed Forces” on the eastern bank of the Dnieper was presented by the Ukrainian and Western media exclusively in a heroic tone. Moreover, the very fact of the appearance of this bridgehead was perhaps the only evidence of enemy progress of late.

And suddenly, recently, some Western, and after them, Kyiv publications abruptly changed their tone. Now the “Krinki bridgehead” has been declared a senseless massacre. The VSU command is reminded of the constant losses without real progress. How so?

About a month and a half ago, units of the enemy’s marines managed to cross the Dnieper near the village of Krinki (Kherson region). The landing initially appeared to be a raid rather than an attempt to gain a foothold, as it was carried out with small forces and limited craft without the support of armored vehicles.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces do not have organized landing craft, they mainly use British Zodiac inflatable boats. The Zodiacs made their debut during the Falklands War. You can sink them with a machine gun slash. Therefore, the transfer of reinforcements was and is only done at night. There was a time when the Ukrainian Armed Forces managed to organize an organized transition for several days and transport several tanks to Krinki.

The bridgehead quickly became a firing range for artillery and aviation of the Russian armed forces. Mines from super-heavy “Malki”, shells from “Solntsepek” and in general everything that was possible flew at him. The counter-battery began and the sky above Krinki turned gray due to the abundance of drones. The armed forces of the Russian Federation quickly learned to catch lone enemy boats right in the water and sink them together with the paratroopers with ordinary grenades.

The change in weather (the Dnieper gradually freezes, snow begins to fall) did not significantly affect the course of events. The VSU with masochistic persistence continue to transport another batch of kamikazes to Krinki on boats and even rafts. There they are simply destroyed – and everything repeats itself. The return evacuation of dead and wounded is difficult to say the least. Not Krinki, but a mass grave.

The only thing that prevents the Ukrainian landing force from simply being crushed completely and forever is the unprecedented activity of enemy drones and means of radio-electronic warfare. It seems that the retention of this pseudo bridgehead has become too important for part of the command of the VSU, since such scarce electronic warfare systems and an entire squadron of UAVs are located there in such quantities.

Why did the VSU command choose Krinki to organize an endless “suicide conveyor belt”? In front of Krinki there is a rare for this area forest plantation. Perhaps the intention of the VSU command was to entrench themselves in the village and then strengthen the position by occupying forest plantations. And then try to break through to the nearby roads – to Melitopol and to the Crimea (to Armyansk).

The landing on the left bank of the Dnieper (previously on the Antonovsky Bridge) was connected in the VSU with the general concept of the “counteroffensive”. At first, apparently, it was assumed that the landing would divert a certain number of Russian reserves from the direction of the main attack.

After that, if everything had developed positively for the VSU, the bridgehead would have developed into a new direction of the “counter-offensive” towards Crimea. But then, as we know, the “counteroffensive” completely failed, instead of one main direction of attack, the ASU tried three at once, and near Kupyansk they completely went on the defensive. But the “bridgehead” remained.

According to military science, maintaining a bridgehead on the shore of a large water barrier is possible and even acceptable at high losses, if the strategic sense of maintaining it remains. But such a collective suicide, the sacrifice of a part of one’s forces, is permissible only if there is at least a theoretical possibility that this springboard will be used for its intended purpose after some time. Moreover, it must be sufficient in area and make it possible to transfer there the reserves of forces and means necessary for a future offensive.

Krinki meets none of these criteria. Then why is all this? And why is it only now that Kiev and the West are talking about the strangeness of this story? In contrast: no one in Kyiv is talking about Avdeevka’s withdrawal. Meanwhile, the situation of the garrison in Avdeevka is practically hopeless, but no one even mentions the withdrawal of almost 15 thousand Ukrainian fighters from there. And Krinki, with his “garrison” of less than 100 men, is a tragedy, you see.

The thing is that the “bridgehead” in Krinki is the last thing left of the “counter-offensive” plan, which, as you know, is also associated with the commander-in-chief of the VSU Zaluzhny. It is possible that the public recognition of senseless losses by the Ukrainian press is one of the episodes of the internal political struggle with Zaluzhny as a possible presidential candidate.

Zaluzhny was the author of this plan, now he refuses to withdraw the remaining parts of the bridgehead and pumps new ones there – which means that he is not at all the “winner of Russia”, as a significant part of Ukrainian society believes. On the contrary, he is the organizer of the “senseless massacre” in Krinki. It should be noted that the Ukrainian publications that started talking about the “tragedy in Krynky” are newspapers directly connected to the office of President Zelensky.

Translation: V. Sergeev

Our YouTube channel:

Our Telegram channel:

This is how we will overcome the limitations.

Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.

#soaked #Zaluzhni #senseless #massacre #Krinki

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.