DxO Mark evaluates the new camera setup with a 50-megapixel chip and a five-fold optical zoom only two points higher than last year’s solution with a 10-megapixel chip and a ten-fold optical zoom. However, the improvement is more noticeable in practice and has also benefited in some other aspects, such as macro photography, which DxO Mark does not take into account in their tests. Some smartphone manufacturers tailor their phones to these tests and collaborate with DxO Mark in developing their camera systems, but Samsung has chosen to go its own way. This may disadvantage Samsung in the tests, but in practice, the camera, as the score proves, is really excellent. Samsung may need to work on video recording, where there has been practically no improvement compared to last year, and the score in the test remains the same (137 points). It is paradoxical that in video recording, the score decreased in disciplines where it increased in still photography, and, for example, the focusing during video recording is slightly better than with the S23 Ultra.
However, Samsung can take joy in another score from the DxO Mark tests: in the evaluation of displays, the S24 Ultra ranks first. It is a close call, with a score of 155 points, just one point higher than this year’s pixels and the standard models S24 and S24+, but again, there is a feeling that the methodology of DxO Mark does not fully appreciate the advantages of the matte finish of the display, which significantly reduces glare. Therefore, the final score is an excellent result.The text discusses the evaluation of the new Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra by DxO Mark, a company that tests and rates the performance of smartphone cameras. The new model with a 50-megapixel chip and 5x optical zoom received only a slightly higher score than the previous model with a 10-megapixel chip and 10x optical zoom. The text suggests that the improvement in the new model is more noticeable in practice, especially in macro photography, which DxO Mark’s test does not fully consider.
The text also mentions that some smartphone manufacturers tailor their devices to perform well in DxO Mark tests, but Samsung takes a different approach and focuses on real-world performance. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra received high scores for its camera performance, but there is room for improvement in video recording compared to its predecessor.
On a positive note, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra received the highest score for display evaluation, thanks to its matte finish that reduces glare.
Overall, the text highlights the discrepancy between test scores and real-world performance, as well as the different strategies adopted by smartphone manufacturers in response to testing methodologies.zachytit skutečnou kvalitu displeje. Nicméně, výsledky testů jsou stále užitečné a poskytují uživatelům orientační informace o tom, co mohou očekávat od daného zařízení.
Celkově lze tedy říci, že testy DxO Mark poskytují užitečné informace o schopnostech fotoaparátů a displejů mobilních zařízení, ale je důležité brát v potaz i vlastní zkušenosti a preference. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra se může i přes určité nedostatky v testech ukázat jako skvělý telefon s vynikajícími fotografickými a displejovými schopnostmi.
