/ world today news/ The legendary Irish nationalist party “Sinn Fein” finally won the main office in Northern Ireland and confirmed its policy of separation from Great Britain. This will not be an easy task, but for Russia it does not matter who gets it. The main thing is how much they will ruin their lives and how quickly they will get to shooting.
An unprecedented political crisis has ended in Northern Ireland, due to which there was no legitimate government and first minister for a year and a half. However, the end of one crisis actually means the beginning of another, as for the first time in history the government is headed by a representative (vice-president) of the Sinn Féin party, Michelle O’Neill.
That is, a nationalist and separatist who justifies the terrorists and their actions, if you look at the situation through the eyes of an Englishman.
Sinn Féin (‘Ourselves’) is a brand of radicals with a hundred years of history – not one organisation, but several, but in the minds of the majority the name is closely fused with the Irish Republican Army, which fought with the British for a united and sovereign Ireland with weapon in hand: Sinn Féin is the political wing of the IRA.
Now the IRA no longer exists, but First Minister O’Neill sympathizes with its fighters and intends to continue their work peacefully – to separate Ulster from Britain and unite Ireland.
After taking office, the very next day she entered into an absentee row with the British government, “vehemently disputing” its documented statement that “the Irish border question has been settled for decades”. Ms O’Neill said her election confirmed change was underway on the island, with Ireland living in a “decade of opportunity”.
Thus the new authorities in Ulster confirmed their intention to say a final “farewell” to London, completing the long-term process of unifying the Irish nation despite the British crown.
The Irish have reason to regard the British as occupiers, oppressors and organizers of genocide, even if these are things of the past, while the terrorism of the IRA is remembered by those alive today.
One can long speculate whether the ambitious Irishwoman will succeed or not, but not all Irishmen treat Englishmen as indicated above. O’Neill’s task is both more dangerous and more difficult than, for example, the Scottish National Party, which seeks the same thing – secession from the United Kingdom. It has been in power for a long time and even managed to hold a failed independence referendum.
Many perceive the Irish history by analogy with the Scottish one, that is, they expect a similar plebiscite from the separatist authorities of Northern Ireland, which, God knows, may end with a victory for “Sinn Fein”.
However, the Scottish scheme will not work in Ulster because it conflicts with the Good Friday Agreements. It was this agreement that ended the decades-long armed conflict in Northern Ireland that claimed thousands of lives. Revision is playing with fire, but that’s not all. All parties must agree to the revision, and here they are at least three, with two out of three strongly against the revision and even more against the actual unification of Ireland.
One side is, of course, London, the capital of a declining empire with fewer options than at any time in the last 500 years. Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s geopolitical ambitions (be it leaving the EU or confronting Russia) and living beyond their means have greatly weakened the British, which appears to give the Irish a “window of opportunity” (10 years in size, according to O’Neill) .
But another party is the Irish – unionists who support retention in Great Britain. Their positions deteriorated significantly, including due to the unpopularity of the British government as a whole. But these are exactly the same Irish people who, according to national stereotypes, are characterized by stubbornness and determination.
In fact, because of their persistence – the Democratic Unionist Party (formerly called the Protestant) – there was no legitimate government in Northern Ireland for almost two years. For the past decade, they and Sinn Féin have shared power: the winner of the general election has the post of First Minister, those who come second have the post of Deputy First Minister with almost the same powers. To make any important decisions, including personnel, consensus of the main forces is needed, or at least non-resistance from one of them. Civil peace is based on this.
Sinn Féin won the May 2022 election and has since held 27 seats in the 90-seat assembly to the DUP’s 25. But all this time Unionists have refused to nominate a new First Minister and thus formally retire to secondary roles in government.
Nominally, it was a protest not against O’Neill’s candidacy, and especially not against the people’s choice (such protests are destructive of civil peace), but against London itself – more precisely against the “Sausage War” and the manner in which it was concluded. Indeed, Northern Ireland already has special rights in the area of trade with the European Union, which unionists say is destroying British unity.
It should be understood that Ulster was not affected: it has more options than the rest of Great Britain. But DUP leader Paul Given has shown enough of his trademark Irish tenacity to defiantly resign as First Minister in February 2022 and prevent a new one being appointed until recently.
Turning to the history and nature of the internal Irish conflict, it is more correct to assume that the Unionists are no less determined than the Separatists and will fight to the end. Even if London continues to decay and the initiative finally passes to Sinn Féin, unionists may take up arms to prevent the collapse of Britain.
The DUP is far from the only unionist party, it is not the most radical and it is not even the most conservative. The distinctive feature of Sinn Féin nationalists is that they are largely a left-wing force with a socialist agenda and an emphasis on minority rights. In this it is almost identical to the Scottish National Party. True, the leader of the Scottish party, as well as the Scottish government, Hamza Yusuf, a Muslim of Pakistani origin.
In other words, the image of the grim nationalist who would pick up a gun to defend his home and abhors the modern multicultural agenda fits an Irish Unionist more than a Sinn Fein supporter. In addition, Sinn Féin, after completing the process of leaving Great Britain, intends to return Ulster to the European Union as part of a united Ireland.
Unionist resistance, the residual faith in Britain’s greatness, the power of “old money”, the presence of only a relative but not an absolute majority in Sinn Féin – all this makes it doubtful that Britain will soon collapse from the west. The priority in this matter is still in the north – Scotland.
However, a “decade of opportunity” suggests at least hope. For Russia, it practically doesn’t matter what to hope for: the breakup of Britain or internal civil strife within it. Further shrinking of a long-term enemy is by definition palatable, even if it means that another enemy, the European Union, will grow.
And modern London has positioned itself in relation to Russia in such a way that to promise it the worst, as it promises us, is a logical and natural reaction. Therefore, we wish success to all three sides of the conflict – the unionists, the separatists and London. Before they part, let them bump into each other.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#Northern #Ireland #giving #ten #years #breakup #Great #Britain
