Exynos 2400 Benchmark Results: How Does Samsung’s Chip Stack Up Against Competitors?
Samsung has been known for its powerful and innovative chips, and the latest addition to their lineup is the Exynos 2400. While it may not be the flagship chip for their super-premium devices, it still holds its own against this year’s and last year’s competitors. In this article, we will dive into the benchmark results of the Exynos 2400 and see how it stacks up in terms of performance.
GeekBench 6 test, which measures CPU performance, shows that the Exynos 2400 is no slouch. With the latest Arm Cortex-X4 and ten CPU cores, it outperforms last year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy and is on par with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 found in the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. This means that users of Exynos-powered devices won’t have to compromise on performance when running demanding applications.
Moving on to PCMark Work 3.0, a benchmark that gauges various common workloads, the Exynos 2400 once again showcases higher scores compared to last year’s Snapdragon-only model. However, it falls slightly short of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Ultra variant. While it may not be at the very top, it still offers a solid performance for everyday tasks.
Where the Exynos 2400 starts to show its weakness is in graphics performance. In 3DMark’s graphics stress tests, specifically the Wild Life stress test, it performs similarly to last year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Galaxy S23. Both chips lag behind the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3-powered Galaxy S24 Ultra and other devices with the same chipset. Additionally, all these phones experience stability issues as temperatures rise.
However, when it comes to more demanding graphics tests like Wild Life Extreme and ray tracing Solar Bay, the Exynos 2400 manages to deliver higher peak performance. But it quickly throttles back, falling behind the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 after just four runs of the Extreme test. This raises concerns about sustained performance. On the bright side, the Exynos 2400’s AMD RDNA 3 architecture excels in ray tracing, offering comparable results to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Ultra. This suggests that the Snapdragon chip is bottlenecked by its ray tracing capabilities compared to AMD’s architecture.
The difference in performance across tests can be attributed to temperature. While both the Exynos 2400 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 reached the same final temperature in stress tests, the Galaxy S24 model heated up faster. This led to lackluster sustained performance, which had a greater impact on frame rates in high-intensity tasks like Wild Life. Gamers should take note of this, as the Exynos-powered Galaxy S24 still delivers solid gaming performance, similar to last year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. However, it shines when it comes to titles that utilize ray tracing graphics, making it a more future-proof option. That being said, upgrading from a Galaxy S23 solely for this reason may not be necessary.
Considering all these factors, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 seems to have an edge over the Exynos 2400 in terms of overall performance. If peak performance is a priority for global customers, investing in the Galaxy S24 Ultra with the Snapdragon chip would be a wise choice, especially for serious gamers.
In conclusion, while the Exynos 2400 may not be Samsung’s flagship chip, it still offers commendable performance in CPU tasks and everyday workloads. Its graphics performance falls slightly short compared to its competitors, but it excels in ray tracing capabilities. Ultimately, customers should consider their specific needs and preferences when choosing between the Exynos-powered Galaxy S24 and the Snapdragon-powered Galaxy S24 Ultra.
