ICJ Orders Israel to Take Measures on Genocide in Gaza: Global Reactions
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has issued an interim ruling on the emergency measures requested by South Africa in its genocide case against Israel over its war in Gaza. While the court did not order a ceasefire, it did instruct Israel to take measures to prevent and punish direct incitement of genocide in the besieged enclave. The ruling has garnered global reactions from various countries and organizations, each expressing their perspectives on the matter.
Palestine, welcoming the ruling, sees it as an important reminder that no state is above the law. Foreign Minister Riyadh Maliki emphasized that the ICJ judges saw through Israel’s politicization and lies, recognizing the gravity of the situation on the ground. Palestine calls on all states to respect the court’s order, including Israel.
On the other hand, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the ruling as outrageous. He asserted that Israel is fighting a just war and will continue to defend itself while adhering to international law. Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir mocked the ICJ, dismissing its authority.
South Africa, the country that brought the case to the ICJ, considers the ruling a decisive victory for international law. It hopes that Israel will not frustrate the application of the court’s orders and sees this ruling as a significant milestone in seeking justice for the Palestinian people.
Hamas, a Palestinian militant group, hailed the court’s ruling as important and contributing to isolating Israel. They believe it exposes Israel’s crimes in Gaza.
The United States stated that the ICJ’s ruling aligns with its view that Israel has the right to take action in accordance with international law to prevent future attacks. The US emphasized that allegations of genocide are unfounded and noted that the court did not make a finding about genocide or call for a ceasefire.
In Gaza, Palestinians expressed devastation over the court’s decision not to order a ceasefire. Many had hoped for immediate relief from Israel’s bombardment and ground invasion. Displaced Palestinians and residents of the occupied West Bank shared their disappointment, acknowledging the historic moment but longing for an end to Israel’s military operations and the allowance of humanitarian aid.
Several countries, including Qatar, Egypt, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Canada, Spain, Ireland, Scotland, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and the European Union, have also responded to the ruling. Their statements range from calling for compliance with the court’s orders to expressing support for a ceasefire and the release of hostages.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch both commended the ruling as an important step in preventing genocide and protecting the people of Gaza. They called for immediate action to enforce the court’s orders and ensure compliance.
The ICJ’s interim ruling has sparked a range of reactions worldwide. While some see it as a victory for justice and international law, others criticize it or express disappointment. The situation in Gaza remains complex and contentious, with ongoing debates about the appropriate measures to address the conflict.
