Explosive Divorce Documents Unveiled in Georgia Election Fraud Case Against Donald Trump
In a shocking turn of events, divorce documents that could potentially impact the election fraud case against former President Donald Trump in Georgia have been unsealed. These documents reveal evidence of a romantic relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor responsible for bringing the election fraud charges against Trump. The unsealed files include credit card charges showing that Willis and Wade took trips together to Florida and California.
The controversy surrounding this case began when defendant Michael Roman alleged in a court filing on January 8th that the relationship between Wade and Willis presented a professional conflict of interest. Roman also accused them of misusing county funds, calling for their dismissal from the case. While Roman did not provide any evidence to support these claims, he pointed to Wade’s sealed divorce documents as proof.
Wade had initially filed for divorce shortly after being appointed as special prosecutor, but he immediately moved to seal the documents, suggesting that there might be information he wanted to keep hidden from the public eye. However, at an emergency hearing in Cobb County, Judge Henry Thompson ruled that the case should be made available to the public, signaling a potential breakthrough in uncovering the truth.
During the hearing, Joycelyn Wade, Nathan Wade’s wife of 26 years, alleged that he had intentionally concealed his true earnings, which amounted to nearly $700,000 as a special prosecutor. She claimed that he did this in an attempt to avoid paying her a fair share in their divorce settlement. Joycelyn’s attorneys also accused Wade of leaving her destitute while lavishly spending money on vacations with Willis.
Willis’s lawyer, Cinque Axom, argued that Willis should not be deposed by Joycelyn since her alleged adultery is irrelevant to the case and has nothing to do with Willis herself. Axom maintained that the only matter at hand is the division of marital assets. However, Joycelyn’s attorney, Andrea Hastings, countered this argument, stating that she wanted to know how Wade had been spending his money, as she had reason to believe he was using it to support another woman.
The unsealed documents from Wade’s divorce also reveal several credit card charges made by him. These charges include expenses from Royal Caribbean Cruises, Vacation Express, and various trips on the Freedom of the Seas cruise liner. However, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that Willis was with Wade during these purchases.
Furthermore, Hastings highlighted that Willis had made false claims about Joycelyn having an affair with one of Wade’s friends, which allegedly ended their marriage in 2017. This claim had not been made until recently, indicating that Willis may have unique personal knowledge regarding the situation.
The Fulton County Board of Commissioner’s audit committee is now investigating Willis for potential misuse of taxpayer funds. Additionally, Joycelyn’s lawyers argue that Wade attempted to hide his true earnings by dissolving his law firm during the divorce proceedings.
Judge Thompson has yet to rule on whether Willis will have to sit for a deposition, stating that Wade should provide evidence about his income and potential extramarital affair before such a decision can be made. Thompson believes that Wade would have firsthand knowledge of these matters.
Joycelyn and her legal team fully support Judge Thompson’s ruling to unseal the divorce documents, emphasizing the importance of transparency in reaching a fair settlement. They anticipate that Wade will be compelled to provide more answers about his conduct and finances during the court proceedings.
Separately, Judge Scott McAfee is presiding over the Georgia election interference case in Fulton County, where he plans to hold a hearing regarding the allegations of Wade and Willis’ relationship in early February. Willis has until February 2nd to respond to these allegations.
As of now, a trial date for the Trump case has not been scheduled. It remains to be seen how these new developments will impact the proceedings and the outcome of the election fraud case.
