Understanding the Limitations of Color Space Coverage: Exploring the Analogies of Tablecloth and Rug Coverage

The point is that it still only covers 100% of the surface of the table, more is physically impossible, whether the tablecloth itself has 2 or 200x the surface area. Covering the same surface twice still results in 100% of the surface being covered.

The problem with this comparison is that the dci-p3 color space is not the total possible color space (a table does include the total possible area of ​​the table), but only a part of it. So you can cover more than the dci-p3 color space. However, a statement such as “154% of the dci-p3 color space” is fairly nonsensical, because you still cover a maximum of 100% of the dci-p3 color space plus another part of the total color space (apparently in terms of “area” comparable to 54% of the dci-p3 color space), but it is a compact way to write this, so I understand why you write it like this from a marketing perspective.

The comparison is: I have a floor, I have drawn a triangle on that floor and I put a rug over that triangle. That cloth can potentially cover more than the triangle, but more than 100% of the triangle is never covered (that’s not possible). The rest of the rug covers more of the floor, but that falls outside the triangle. Saying that the cloth covers 150% of the triangle is nonsensical, but most people will understand that you mean: 100% of the triangle and 50% of the area outside the triangle.

2023-12-30 09:11:59
#unveils #compact #lightweight #laser #projector #handle