Home » News » The multipolarity of the G-2 of Russia and China versus the unipolarity of the US and its dollar – PublicoGT

The multipolarity of the G-2 of Russia and China versus the unipolarity of the US and its dollar – PublicoGT

Alfredo Jalife-Rahme

B

garlic concept Strategic Stability There are 3 nuclear superpowers: the US, Russia and China. Kissinger operated a US-China G-2 against Russia in the 1970s, while Brzezinski longed for a US-China G-2 against Russia (https://bit.ly/453PEne).

The US G-2, a genuine beggar with a nuclear cudgel, errs on the side of hyperbolic American-centrism with the mythical exceptionalism theological of his Manifest Destiny.

Due to the consecutive geostrategic errors of the Clintons, Obama, Trump and Biden in their confrontational management against Moscow and/or Beijing, I suggested years ago that a G-2 had been created out of defensive necessity. who does not dare to say his name between Russia and China versus US unipolarity.

Now the press review by the Russian Tass agency has dared to formulate that “Russia and China crystallize a G-2 (https://bit.ly/3RzTIZy)”. Tass quotes Alexander Lomanov, deputy director of the Institute of International Relations and World Economy at the prestigious Russian Academy of Sciences: Faced with growing pressure from the US and its allies, Moscow and Beijing are making increasingly active joint efforts aimed at neutralizing threats to their security as much as possible and minimizing the growing costs in their relations with the West.. He added: The West’s behavior is becoming more confrontational and harsh, and this makes the strategic rapprochement between Moscow and Beijing increasingly relevant..

He stated bombastically that “before our eyes, Russia and China are creating an informal ‘G-2’ that will have its own weight, in unison with the G-7 and the G-20.”

It was striking that Lomanov did not mention the 11-BRICS+, which represents the majority of the human race and controls 80 percent of world oil production.

Tass/Kommersant note that Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had held talks on the island of Malta with National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan –in an attempt to weaken strategic ties between Russia and China– before traveling to Moscow for a four-day visit, within the framework of the 18th round (sic) of Strategic Security of Russia and China. Wang met with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov; Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev and President Putin, who accepted the invitation to meet Xi Jinping in China in October as a special guest at the Silk Road Forum (https://bit.ly/48subap). Putin stated that Russia and China maintain a unified position to form a multipolar world.

Global Times He stated that “Russia firmly supports China’s just stance on the Taiwan issue, and on issues related to Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong, and opposes Western interference in China’s internal affairs (https://bit.ly/3ERTO7g)”.

The Portuguese Antonio Guterres, Secretary General of the UN, presented the great fracture of the world (https://bit.ly/463SidZ), which is not a brilliant discovery, which I had already expressed in my book Ukraine, the world’s first hybrid war: fracture of the biosphere (https://bit.ly/3NnaoQg).

Today the UN has deepened its dysfunctionality when four leaders of the five permanent members of the Security Council did not attend this year’s General Assembly: only Biden attended!

Until Financial Timesspokesperson for the neoliberal globalist monarchy, champions the divided world due to a Cold War-like impasse over US tensions with China and the Ukraine dispute (https://on.ft.com/3ZqNEo1).

The renowned British analyst and diplomat Alastair Crooke (https://bit.ly/454jzf1) –in his shocking interview with “Judge Napolitano (https://bit.ly/3ENXXJ4)” – defines the great war, in the post-Ukraine phase, of the West against the G-2 of Russia and China, where the 11-BRICS+ undertake the odyssey of de-dollarization that leads – with the double war on energy and food / fertilizers – to an unstoppable rise in interest rates and uncontrollable inflation in the G-7.

Source La Jornada


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.