insurance-ok-(motorzoom)
Anyone who has a car knows perfectly well that they will not be able to drive it, unless they want to incur heavy fines and greater risks, without having signed up for a necessary Insurance Policy. Now there is a sensational ruling. Which?
Whoever drives has the need for itlegal obligation to sign an agreement insurance coverage with a company in the sector that allows the vehicle to be, precisely ‘insured’ in case of claims.
The policies, in this case the Policy RC Carare binding from point Of normative view and a vehicle that was not in the position of having signed up for a regular one would really find itself in trouble trouble. Everyone knows it, it’s clear.
The risk, moreover, is not only that if one patrol ci would stop at a checkpoint or control point you would find yourself with a huge fine to pay, but also that linked to our safety in case of accidents.
The insurance policies, at all levels (and therefore that of the Auto TPL is certainly no exception) they are created precisely to guarantee anyone who finds themselves involved in an unpleasant situation, financial coverage aimed at covering the consequences.
Car insurance, here is the historic ruling that turns everything upside down
Il concept from the insurance it’s simple: a premium is established, a figure that is paid semi-annually or annually to the company insurance company and, in case of accident on the street, you have coverage from the same. Danni to people or things, damage to another car: they will all come paid from the insurance. Or rather, not all.
As we know, the so-called ceilings: namely the roofs maximums, from an economic point of view, within which the company insurance is estate per law to pay. Once those are exceeded, it is no longer an insurance problem and any excess coverage is up to the person responsible for the accident. But is it really like that?
insurance limits – (motorzoom)
Insurance: here’s what changes on the limits
A ruling has arrived that seems destined to make history: if the maximum limits are exceeded, the insurance would still be required and forced to pay compensation. Who says that? The Supreme Court. In particular, one of his ordinances confirms an orientation on the so-called mala management from the company.
Which is required to pay damages to the insured beyond the maximal indicated in contract if, for example, the insurer culpably refuses one offer Of transaction positive and fuels a dispute between the parties so that the insured risks going beyond the economic limits foreseen by contract.
2023-09-11 05:00:45
#Insurance #exceed #maximum #limit #forced #compensate #Historic #ruling #Supreme #Court #motorzoom.it