Monika Binias, formerly known as Monika Štiková, has recently found herself in the middle of a media storm. The well-known attention seeker has stirred up controversy with her spicy comments, but her ex-husband Michal Štika is not holding back in his response.
Monika and her daughter Ornella Koktová have taken issue with Simona Krainová, who recently created an account on a platform known for adult content. While Ornella sees Simona’s move as “humiliating and attention-seeking,” Monika considers the behavior of the top model to be “rock bottom.”
Michal Štika, however, disagrees with Monika and Ornella’s stance. He believes that everyone has the right to make their own choices and express themselves freely. “It’s their opinion, and they have the right to present it to the world. But personally, I wouldn’t do it. I don’t like it. I think such things should be kept private. There are probably more people who share a similar opinion to Ornella and Monika, but they don’t publicize it. They let people breathe. Everyone should be free to do what they want. For me, the foundation of life is to be free and do what I want. That’s why I don’t like it when someone interferes with the freedom and rights of others,” Štika told Expres.
Štika also made it clear that he is not a fan of the platform in question, OnlyFans. Although he has never used it himself, he has heard that it contains explicit content. However, he believes that in a democracy, everyone has the right to live their life as they please, as long as they don’t harm others. If someone finds it suitable to share photos or videos of that nature and earns money from it, that’s their choice.
Regarding Simona Krainová’s decision, Štika points out that if her husband, Karel Vágner Jr., has no problem with it, then there is no reason why the model shouldn’t create an OnlyFans account.
In an interview with ŽivotvČesku.cz, Štika expressed his confusion over Monika’s criticism of Simona, calling her a “faithless and promiscuous woman” who has no right to speak about “lynching morally loose women.”
“I think I don’t need to elaborate further. Everything is clear from my statement. She should keep quiet when she herself is not saintly,” Štika concluded.
Currently, Štika is enjoying a content life with his partner and their beloved dog, Chanel Princess.
Does Monika’s support for Simona reflect her true beliefs or is it a strategic move to remain in the public eye
Believes that Simona is just “expressing herself freely.” Monika has even gone on to defend Simona, saying that she is an “inspiration” for women who want to show their true selves without fear of judgment.
However, Monika’s ex-husband, Michal Štika, has a different opinion. He accuses Monika of being a hypocrite, claiming that she is only defending Simona because she wants to stay relevant in the media. Michal believes that Monika is using this controversy as a way to gain attention and boost her own fame.
The public has been divided on this issue, with some applauding Monika for supporting Simona’s freedom of expression, while others criticize her for being opportunistic and attention-seeking herself.
Monika has always been a controversial figure in the media. From her provocative social media posts to her constant presence in the tabloids, she has never shied away from the spotlight. She has often been criticized for seeking attention and for her controversial views on various topics.
Whether Monika is truly defending Simona out of genuine belief or if she is simply using this controversy to stay relevant is up for debate. Either way, it seems that Monika Binias, formerly known as Monika Štiková, is once again at the center of attention in the media storm.
I completely agree, OnlyFans has become a platform for attention-seeking and has lost its original purpose. It is disappointing to see the degradation of content on this platform.
While I understand the concerns about OnlyFans, it’s important to recognize that individuals have the right to use the platform as they choose. We should focus on promoting a healthy and respectful online environment, rather than passing judgment on people’s choices for self-expression.