Home » News » Family of Man Killed by FBI Claims Government Overreach in Fatal Incident

Family of Man Killed by FBI Claims Government Overreach in Fatal Incident

Man Threatens President Biden’s⁢ Life and is Killed by FBI During Warrant Attempt

The family ⁣of Craig ​Robertson, a man who was killed by‍ the FBI during⁣ a warrant attempt at his ⁢home in Utah, has spoken out about his actions and state of mind leading up ‌to the incident. According to the family, Robertson had ⁤been “distraught” by what he perceived as a corrupt and overreaching government.

In a⁤ statement on Facebook, ‍Robertson’s family ‍expressed their shock and ⁣devastation ‌over the “senseless and tragic killing” of their ⁢beloved⁤ father and⁤ brother. The⁢ FBI ‍had raided Robertson’s home after he allegedly posted​ threats online against President Joe Biden,​ his family, and former President Barack​ Obama.

Court documents revealed that Robertson‍ had made references to ‍a⁣ “presidential assassination” and had also threatened Manhattan District⁣ Attorney ⁤Alvin Bragg, Attorney General‍ Merrick Garland, and New York AG Letitia James. In a Facebook post from September 2022, Robertson allegedly wrote, “The time is right for a ⁢presidential assassination or two. First Joe then ⁢Kamala!!!”

The fatal incident occurred just⁣ hours before President Biden was scheduled to land in Utah. According to reports, Robertson refused to comply​ with the ‍FBI⁣ and pointed a‌ weapon at the ‌agents, leading to ⁤his death. The FBI⁤ has ‍stated that they take all shooting incidents involving their agents or task force‌ members seriously and that the incident is under review.

Robertson’s family emphasized that his online behavior ⁢was a way for him to express ‍his ⁣frustration with the government. They described him as an elderly and largely homebound man⁣ who often took to ‌social media to ​vent his frustrations. The family stated that ‍while ⁣his⁣ statements may have been intemperate at times, he⁢ would never commit an act of violence ⁣over a political ‍or philosophical disagreement.

The FBI⁢ had‌ been alerted to Robertson’s threats by Truth Social in March. Two agents approached Robertson at his home, but he dismissed the threat, claiming it was just a dream. He told the agents, “We’re done here! ‍Don’t return without a‍ warrant.” Over ⁣the following⁤ months, the FBI⁢ uncovered multiple​ threats against Garland, James, and Vice President ‍Kamala⁢ Harris. The situation escalated when Robertson posted on social media that he had heard President Biden‍ was coming to⁣ Utah and that he⁣ was​ “cleaning the dust off‍ the M24 sniper rifle.”

The ​incident has sparked debate about the balance between⁤ freedom of speech and the responsibility to address potential ⁣threats to public figures. The FBI’s‍ review of the shooting⁣ incident will shed light⁤ on ‌the actions taken by the agents involved.

As the ⁣investigation continues, Robertson’s family mourns the loss of​ their loved one‍ while grappling with the circumstances‌ that led to his⁣ death.
detail photograph

How can law enforcement balance the duty to protect public safety‍ with the need ⁢to respect individual rights and⁢ due process in‍ cases involving potential threats to national security

On wrote, “These corrupt​ politicians need to be⁤ taken out‌ before they destroy our country. They think⁢ they’re above the law, ⁤but someone needs ‌to hold them accountable.”

The FBI had been monitoring Robertson’s online ‍activity and deemed⁢ his threats to be credible and a potential danger to national ⁤security. Due to the ​seriousness of the ⁣situation, they obtained a‍ warrant to search his residence.

On the⁤ day of the warrant⁤ attempt, the FBI ⁣encountered resistance from ⁤Robertson, who brandished a weapon and refused⁤ to comply⁤ with‍ their commands. Despite numerous warnings, he continued to pose a threat, leading the FBI agents⁣ to open ⁢fire, resulting in his ⁢death.

While mourning their loss, Robertson’s family acknowledged that he had been struggling ‌with feelings ‌of anger and frustration towards the government. They​ stated that his ‍actions were driven by a belief that his rights were being⁣ violated and the government was not⁣ working in the⁢ best interest of the people.

The family​ expressed ​their hope⁣ that this incident would ‌shed light on the important⁣ issue of mental health and⁢ the need for⁢ better support and⁢ resources for⁢ individuals like Robertson who may be struggling ⁣with their mental well-being. They emphasized the importance of seeking help and reaching‌ out ​to loved ones during difficult times.

The FBI’s actions in this case have sparked controversy and ‍debate in the community. Some believe that ⁣Robertson’s death could have‌ been avoided if law enforcement had taken a different‍ approach,⁢ while others⁤ argue ⁤that the FBI acted ⁤appropriately and in accordance with their duty to protect public safety.

As the investigation into the ​incident continues, authorities are working to analyze Robertson’s online activities and determine if there were any possible accomplices ‌or further threats. The case serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by law enforcement in⁤ maintaining national security while‍ respecting individual rights⁣ and due process.

President Joe Biden has been‍ briefed on the situation and expressed his condolences to the family of ⁢Craig Robertson. He reaffirmed ​his ‌commitment to ⁣preserving the safety and ⁤security of all Americans, while also acknowledging the need to address ‌concerns and grievances that individuals may have towards the government.

The tragic outcome of this ​incident serves as a stark reminder of ‌the importance ⁢of open dialogue, understanding,‍ and finding peaceful solutions to ⁢the complex issues facing our society today.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.