Puriņš noted the ability of the opponents to analyze and complicate the pattern of “Riga’s” game: “They [“Twente”] we were looked at very well, we already had to change a lot during the game. They knew well what we were going to do. That [izpētes līmeni] can’t even compare to RFS [teikts kā salīdzinošs piemērs].
“I reacted better and read the situation. It helped to repel those shots. Both the defenders and Elbashire [Ngoms]both [Antonijs] Chernomordy, helped and blocked several shots,” the 24-year-old goalkeeper said about neutralizing the opponents’ dangerous shots.
“It can be said that we have now met the opponent. Of course, [komandu] the levels are different, but we saw that we can run away [pretuzbrukumos]. The situation improved in the second half, but for us [uzbrukumā] missed several times [precīzas] last passes. In Riga, we have a small chance to catch up and make our opponents nervous. [Lai to paveiktu] We need to be smarter about these adversaries [nekā atbildes spēlē pret Ungārijas “Kecskemét”, kad “Riga” ar apjomīgus spēkus pārvirzīja uzbrukumā]proper research must be done,” Puriņš said.
African legionnaires Ngom and team newcomer Taivo, for whom this was the fifth game in the ranks of “Riga”, expressed their belief that “Riga” has a good chance to rehabilitate in the return game and confirm the advantages of their field.
Shortly before the second goal was lost, Ngom, who blocked the opponent’s shot, admitted that the team was not ready for the high level of play the opponents would show in the first half, so the first act of the match turned out to be more difficult than the second, in which the “Riga” footballers were more familiar with the opponents.
2023-08-10 22:36:00
#Puriņš #Twente #knew #compare #RFS
