ng already exported a significant amount of grain under the agreement. However, the suspension of the deal raises concerns about the future stability of global food prices and the potential for increased hunger and famine in vulnerable regions.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba condemned Russia’s decision, accusing them of using hunger as a tool to blackmail the world and pursue their own commercial interests. He called on Russia to “stop playing hunger games” and emphasized the devastating impact that the termination of the agreement would have on global food prices.
The United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, also criticized Russia’s move, calling it “another act of cruelty” and accusing Moscow of holding humanity hostage. She warned that vulnerable populations globally could face starvation and famine if the grain agreement is not extended.
Richard Gowan, the U.N. Director for the International Crisis Group, noted that Russia’s suspension of the deal may be a tactic to force the U.N. and Western powers to offer more concessions. He also highlighted Russia’s growing contempt for the U.N. and expressed doubts about the future of the grain export pact.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep regret over Russia’s decision to terminate the implementation of the Black Sea Initiative. He credited the agreement with facilitating the safe passage of over 32 million metric tons of food commodities from Ukrainian ports and reducing food prices by over 23 percent since March last year.
The grain deal has been crucial in ensuring the safe export of grain, foodstuffs, and fertilizers from Ukraine and Russia. However, the agreement has faced challenges, including the need for adjustments and Russia’s lax enforcement of certain aspects. The demand for a regularized payment system and Russia’s request for its agricultural bank to be admitted to the SWIFT banking payment system have also complicated the implementation of the agreement.
Despite these challenges, the grain deal has significantly alleviated the global food price crisis and allowed for the resumption of grain exports from Ukraine and Russia. The suspension of the agreement raises concerns about the future stability of global food prices and the potential impact on vulnerable regions.
While the impact of the suspension may be mitigated by Russia’s previous grain exports, the international community remains concerned about the potential for increased hunger and famine. Efforts are underway to address the situation and find a resolution that ensures the continued stability of global food prices and the well-being of vulnerable populations.Ukraine has called on Russia to “stop playing hunger games” after Russia announced its suspension of an agreement that allowed both countries to export grain. The breakdown of the Black Sea Grain Initiative, brokered by the United Nations and Turkey, has raised concerns about global food prices and highlighted the tension between Ukraine and Russia. Russia claims that the US and Ukraine’s other international partners have made it impossible for them to export certain agricultural products. Ukraine’s Foreign Minister, Dmytro Kuleba, warned that the termination of the agreement would lead to an increase in grain prices worldwide, affecting vulnerable regions in Asia and Africa. The move by Russia has been criticized by the US Ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, who called it ”another act of cruelty” and accused Russia of holding “humanity hostage.” The UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres
What are the potential consequences of the recent suspension of the grain agreement between Russia and Ukraine for global food prices and vulnerable regions?
Already, a significant amount of grain has been exported under the agreement between Russia and Ukraine. However, the recent suspension of the deal has raised concerns about the future stability of global food prices and the potential for increased hunger and famine in vulnerable regions.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba condemned Russia’s decision, accusing them of using hunger as a tool to blackmail the world and pursue their own commercial interests. He called on Russia to “stop playing hunger games” and emphasized the devastating impact that the termination of the agreement would have on global food prices.
Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, also criticized Russia’s move, calling it ”another act of cruelty” and accusing Moscow of holding humanity hostage. She warned that vulnerable populations globally could face starvation and famine if the grain agreement is not extended.
Richard Gowan, the U.N. Director for the International Crisis Group, noted that Russia’s suspension of the deal may be a tactic to force the U.N. and Western powers to offer more concessions. He also highlighted Russia’s growing contempt for the U.N. and expressed doubts about the future of the grain export pact.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep regret over Russia’s decision to terminate the implementation of the Black Sea Initiative. He credited the agreement with facilitating the safe passage of over 32 million metric tons of food commodities from Ukrainian ports and reducing food prices by over 23 percent since March last year.
The grain deal has been crucial in ensuring the safe export of grain, foodstuffs, and fertilizers from Ukraine and Russia. However, the agreement has faced challenges, including the need for adjustments and Russia’s lax enforcement of certain aspects.
