Lectures: 52
There are exuberant bizarre versions of what happened in the dramatic ephemeral riot on June 23/24, while a fierce propaganda war
between the two largest geopolitical blocs United States/NATO/European Union and the G-2 of Russia and China (https://bit.ly/439pHSa). To each their version and their tastes.
A more credible narrative is that of the iconic investigator Seymour Hersh (SH), who enjoys close interaction with the Deep State spy agencies and argues the opposite of what Secretary of State Antony Blinken (AB) advertised, and the uncritical paraphernalia of United States multimedia: “The revolt
who did not go and strengthen Putin” (https://bit.ly/443IcbX).
The ephemeral riot that caused the madness (sic) by Prighozin
it had the boomerang effect by consolidating the power of the Russian president, who later achieved an incredible 90 percent acceptance rate due to the patriotic exaltation of the moment.
According to SH, winner of the Pulitzer Prize, the Biden administration had few glorious days last week
due to the disaster in progress
in Ukraine, which “led to The New York Times (NYT) headlines slipping (sic) from Ukraine’s failed counter-offensive, to Prighozin’s threat to Putin’s control (https://nyti.ms/44qWhjO).
After mocking an NYT headline that bulged the Putin’s loss of power
SH lashed out at the Armenian-American columnist David Ignatius, State Department equerry at The Washington Post, who repeats the same chant of his ventriloquist AB (https://wapo.st/443ymqL).
SH asserts that there was no march to Moscow and there was no significant threat (megasic!) to Putin’s order
.
Then he sympathizes with the Washington columnists and Homeland Security correspondents who seem to rely heavily on official assertions from White House and State Department officials
and those who deny the total disaster occurred with the Ukrainian military counteroffensive
.
SH shines by quoting verbatim – surely they allowed him to record – to the source (sic) knowledgeable of the United States espionage community
who claims that First and foremost, Putin is now in a stronger position.
(¡megasic!).
The anonymous source reports that since January 2023 the clash was inevitable between the generals, supported by Putin, and Prigo (note: derogatory diminutive of Prigozhin), propped up by ultranationalist extremists
(¡megasic!).
The source of yore describes that the slow, clumsy and unimaginative large regular army, under Putin, slowly changed their strategy from the offensive of conquest of Greater Ukraine to the defense of what they already possessed
while Prigo refused to accept the change and continued his offensive against Bakhmut.
. Ultimately, according to the source, Prigo, very savvy with finances, he is a former hot dog cart owner with no political or military accomplishments
.
Actually, three months ago Wagner was recycled off the Bakhmut front and sent to the abandoned barracks north of Rostov-on-Don for demobilization
when your heavy equipment was mostly redistributed and its force was reduced to almost 8 thousand, of which 2 thousand went to Rostov escorted (megasic!) by the local police
(¡megasic!).
The source concludes that Putin had the full support of the army that let Prigo make a fool of himself and now disappear into ignominy. All without breaking a sweat militarily and without Putin having a run-in with the fundamentalists, who were ardent admirers of Prigo. quite cunning
(sic). Rather: Sublime raise of judoka Putin!
SH fustiga the yawning gap between how espionage professionals and the espionage community assess the situation and what the White House and Washington supine (sic) press project to the public by uncritically reproducing statements by Blinken and his cohort of hawks
(sic) when the Biden’s comprehensive foreign policy is at risk in Ukraine
.
The beloved readers will know who to believe or who to be fooled by.
By Alfredo Jalife-Rahme
Facebook: AlfredoJalife
Tiktok: ZM8KnkKQn/
