Lithuania’s state-owned power transmission system operator, Litgrid, has recently purchased equipment manufactured in China to synchronize the country’s power transmission networks with continental European networks. This move comes as Lithuania aims to desynchronize its power grid from the Russian and Belarusian power grids by February 2024.
Litgrid’s general director, Roks Masjulis, confirmed the purchase of Chinese equipment, stating that it was difficult to completely abandon Chinese production. The equipment was purchased at the request of the German company Siemens, which is the contractor for the synchronization project. Masjulis explained that Chinese equipment is designed to connect or disconnect from the grid and that its purchase did not require a separate permit as Chinese products were already included in the list of appropriate equipment.
While Litgrid is gradually moving away from products made in China, Masjulis emphasized that abandoning all Chinese products immediately would slow down the synchronization process and increase costs. He also highlighted that Litgrid successfully performed an isolated operation test of the national electricity system on April 22.
The synchronization of Lithuania’s power grid with continental Europe is a significant step towards enhancing energy security and reducing dependence on Russia. Currently, the power supply systems of the Baltic States are part of the Russian power supply system IPS/UPS, known as the BRELL circle. This arrangement poses geopolitical and energy security risks as Russia controls the frequency of the supply system and can influence the operation of the Baltic States’ power supply system.
The European Commission has recognized the synchronization of the Baltic States’ electricity networks as a political and financial priority. Over 1.2 billion euros have been allocated for the implementation of this project. Lithuania’s commitment to synchronizing its electricity network with Western Europe by February 2024 aligns with the European Commission’s objectives.
While Lithuania is determined to proceed with the synchronization, Latvia and Estonia have expressed doubts about the possibilities and profitability of desynchronization earlier than previously planned. However, Lithuania’s successful inspection in April has paved the way for considering withdrawal from the BRELL agreement in February 2024. Missing this opportunity would delay the desynchronization process until 2025, potentially hindering plans to synchronize the networks with continental Europe sooner.
Overall, Litgrid’s purchase of Chinese equipment marks a significant step towards achieving Lithuania’s goal of synchronizing its power grid with continental Europe, enhancing energy security, and reducing dependence on Russia.
What are the potential risks and drawbacks associated with relying on a single supplier for critical infrastructure projects like the synchronization project in Lithuania?
Hina and diversifying its suppliers, Masjulis emphasized that it is currently impossible to completely eliminate Chinese production from the company’s operations. He believes that relying on a single supplier could lead to a shortage of equipment and hinder the synchronization project’s progress.
The synchronization project is crucial for Lithuania’s energy independence as it seeks to reduce its reliance on Russian and Belarusian power grids. By February 2024, Lithuania aims to be fully synchronized with the continental European networks, enabling it to operate independently and strengthen its energy security.
The purchase of Chinese equipment was made in collaboration with Siemens, the contractor for the synchronization project. Siemens requested the equipment and Litgrid included Chinese products in its list of appropriate equipment, making it easier to acquire without the need for additional permits.
While there has been a growing global concern regarding the dependence on Chinese technology, Litgrid’s decision highlights the challenges of completely abandoning Chinese production and the need for a diversified supply chain. As Lithuania continues to work towards its energy independence, it recognizes the importance of not relying solely on a single supplier for its critical infrastructure projects.
“Choosing Chinese equipment for power transmission synchronization in Lithuania allows for cost-effective and efficient solutions. It not only strengthens bilateral ties but also fosters technological advancements, paving the way for a more sustainable and reliable energy sector.”
“Choosing Chinese equipment for power transmission synchronization in Lithuania could be a cost-effective solution, given China’s advancement in the power sector. However, it is crucial to closely evaluate the quality and reliability of the equipment to ensure long-term sustainability and compatibility with Lithuania’s energy infrastructure.”