Title: Debate Over Non-Arrest Privilege Sparks Controversy in South Korea
Date: June 22, 2023
In a recent discussion on KBC Radio’s ‘Park Yeong-hwan’s Current Affairs 1st Street’, Bae Jong-ho, vice chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee of the Democratic Party, defended the non-arrest privilege enjoyed by members of the National Assembly. The debate was ignited by Lee Jae-myung, the representative of the Democratic Party, and the oath ceremony of ruling party members.
Bae Jong-ho argued that the non-arrest privilege, which originated in 17th century England to protect parliamentary activities from royal authority, is a constitutional system that has been established and codified in the US federal court. He emphasized that in South Korea, this privilege has been guaranteed since the Constitutional Assembly and serves to protect the legitimate legislative activities of lawmakers.
The vice chairman further stated that if there is even a 1% risk, the privilege of non-arrest should be maintained. He also accused the Yoon Seok-yeol regime of political oppression, claiming that selective investigations and prosecutions are being carried out on a large scale. Representative Lee Jae-myung was cited as an example, with Bae Jong-ho alleging that Lee conducted over 300 seizures and searches but failed to investigate certain individuals, such as Mrs. Kim Gun-hee and other family members.
Bae Jong-ho highlighted the support for the non-arrest privilege by former CEO Song Young-gil, who argued that it is strongly needed. However, he cautioned against taking Song’s opinion too seriously, as Song himself is currently under investigation for an alleged money bag case.
The debate surrounding the non-arrest privilege has sparked controversy in South Korea, with differing opinions on its necessity and potential abuse. Critics argue that the privilege can be misused to protect lawmakers from facing legal consequences for their actions, while proponents maintain that it is crucial for safeguarding the legislative process.
As the discussion continues, it remains to be seen whether any changes will be made to the non-arrest privilege in South Korea. The Democratic Party’s stance on the matter suggests a belief in the importance of protecting lawmakers’ activities, while critics call for a reevaluation of the system to ensure accountability and transparency.
Copyright@ KWANGJU BROADCASTING COMPANY. All rights reserved.
Should South Korea abolish the non-arrest privilege enjoyed by members of the National Assembly?
Itled “Debate over Non-Arrest Privilege: South Korea’s Controversial Discussion.”
In a recent episode of KBC Radio’s ‘Park Yeong-hwan’s Current Affairs 1st Street’, Bae Jong-ho, vice chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee of the Democratic Party, addressed the ongoing controversy surrounding the non-arrest privilege enjoyed by members of the National Assembly in South Korea. The debate was sparked by Lee Jae-myung, the representative of the Democratic Party, during the ruling party members’ oath ceremony.
Bae Jong-ho defended the historical roots of the non-arrest privilege, tracing its origins back to 17th century England
This article sheds light on the significance of the non-arrest privilege held by members of the National Assembly. It delves into the key role this privilege plays in democratic governance, while acknowledging the ensuing controversy surrounding its application. A thought-provoking read for those interested in understanding the intricacies of the Democratic Party’s perspective on this issue.
This article excellently sheds light on the significance and controversy surrounding the non-arrest privilege in the National Assembly. It provides insightful perspectives from the Democratic Party, highlighting the need for careful deliberation on this matter. A thought-provoking read indeed.