The Democratic Party’s innovation committee is facing the possibility of setting the agenda for the “abolition of the representative system” advocated by pro-Lee Jae-myung circles. This agenda has become a major point of contention between pro-myung and non-myung factions within the party, and there are concerns that it could ignite further conflicts within the party.
An official from the office of a senior member of the House of Representatives expressed concerns about the potential consequences of putting the “abolition of the representative system” on the agenda. They stated that such a move could escalate the internal conflict within the party. The official analyzed that the pro-myung circles are likely pushing for the “abolishment of the representative system.”
However, Rep. Kim Young-jin, who is responsible for the party representative and heads the political affairs coordination office, downplayed the possibility of discussing the abolition of the representative system. He stated that the Innovation Committee is currently focused on various tasks and that this particular issue is unlikely to be a core task.
The call to abolish the representative system has been consistently raised by pro-Myeong lawmakers. They argue that the current system distorts democracy within the party due to the unequal voting power between rightful party members and delegates in party elections.
Last month, CEO Lee Jae-myeong held a meeting with 57 chairpersons who proposed the abolition of the representative system. Supreme Council member Jang Gyeong-tae, belonging to the pro-Myeong faction, also raised the same agenda, claiming that the delegate system is susceptible to corruption.
However, within the party, there is a belief that addressing suspicions of corruption and restoring voters’ trust should take priority over resolving the intra-party system. With the upcoming general elections next year, the restoration of public trust is seen as a higher priority than resolving internal party issues that have less public interest.
The Democratic Party’s innovation committee will need to carefully consider the potential consequences and implications of the “abolition of the representative system” agenda. The decision they make could have a significant impact on the party’s unity and future activities.
Why does Representative Kim Young-jin downplay the likelihood of discussing the abolition of the representative system and emphasize that it is not a core priority for the committee
The Innovation Committee of the Democratic Party is facing a significant challenge as it considers setting the agenda for the “abolition of the representative system,” a proposal put forth by pro-Lee Jae-myung circles. This proposal has become a major point of contention within the party, causing divisions between pro-Myeong and non-Myeong factions, and raising concerns about potential conflicts.
An official from the office of a senior member of the House of Representatives expressed worries about the possible consequences of including the “abolition of the representative system” on the agenda. They believe that such a move could escalate internal conflicts within the party. The official also suggested that the pro-Myeong circles are likely the ones pushing for this agenda.
However, Representative Kim Young-jin, who is responsible for the party’s representation and heads the political affairs coordination office, played down the likelihood of discussing the abolition of the representative system. He emphasized that the Innovation Committee is currently focused on various tasks and that this particular issue is unlikely to be a core priority.
The proposal to abolish the representative system has consistently been advocated by pro-Myeong lawmakers. They argue that the current system distorts democracy within the party as it gives unequal voting power between party members and delegates in party elections.
Recently, CEO Lee Jae-myung held a meeting with 57 chairpersons who also proposed the abolition of the representative system. Jang Gyeong-tae, a Supreme Council member belonging to the pro-Myeong faction, raised the same agenda, claiming that the delegate system is susceptible to corruption.
However, there is a belief within the party that addressing suspicions of corruption and restoring voters’ trust should take precedence over resolving issues within the intra-party system. With the general elections approaching next year, the restoration of public trust is seen as a higher priority than resolving internal party matters with less public interest.
The Democratic Party’s innovation committee must carefully consider the potential consequences and implications of the “abolition of the representative system” agenda. Its decision will have a significant impact on the party’s unity and future activities.
This article provides a concise overview of the prospects and challenges surrounding the ‘Abolition of the Representative System’ in the Innovation Committee. It highlights the differing opinions and disagreements among experts, offering a balanced portrayal of the situation. Overall, it sheds light on the complexity of this issue and sparks further discussion on the topic.