Controversy over Fabio Fazio and the Importance of Pluralism on Public Television

Shorted left up Fabio Fazio. In the end all the knots come home to roost, especially if the controversy is instrumental. TO A clean sweepon La7, Corrado Formigli supports the thesis of the Bulgarian edict against the conductor of What’s the weather like. To give him a hand the deputy of the Democratic Party Deborah Serracchiani and the deputy director of HuffingtonPost Alessandro De Angelis

Lone beater the poor one Annalisa Chiricobut defends itself very well. And fight back. “Perhaps you, who know Rai better than me, know what Rai occupied by the left means, you know well what it means,” he turns cryptic to De Angelis, who is also the author of Half an hour more, the Sunday talk by Lucia Annunziata on Rai 3. «Annalisa you are rude, you have to let me finish. You are a big rude!», he throws her into a rage, who had just attacked the next general manager of viale Mazzini Giampaolo Rossi.

“I’m telling you that it’s not correct to mention a person who isn’t there,” Chirico reiterates. However, the debate becomes almost surreal when the journalist points out an indisputable fact: «What is attributed to Fazio is not the lack of competence, but the lack of pluralism which, Corrado, is registered in the law as an obligation for a public TV”. Formigli goes into a rage: “Come on Annalisa, what does pluralism have to do with it, Fazio doesn’t do a talk, he does interviews, it’s a different format, you want to understand”. And Serracchiani echoes him: “But what does pluralism have to do with it?”. Now everything is a little clearer: the left contests the government for having attacked pluralism, but to defend Fazio he claims that, at least he, was not required to be a pluralist. Miracles of single thought (fazist).