Wild Lucarelli he also takes it out on Beasts. The columnist, who spoke on her podcast “Il Sottosopra”, does not like Francesca Fagnani’s conducting: “I waited for the end of this edition to comment on it because, to put it simply, I wanted to understand where it was going”. And this is just the beginning: “Reading social networks and sites, Beasts is the biggest television case in the history of humanity. The day before the broadcast, my timeline is invaded by shocking statements made to Beasts, by people which declares a Francesca Fagnani of having been attacked, abused, by people who say they like peas too much”, continues Lucarelli with reference to a confession by Bianca Balti.
Read also: “The phenomenon”. Fagnani out in the open: the flop guest at Belve
And yet for her”Beasts it’s not a program, it’s something between a regressive hypnosis session in which people suddenly bring out what they had removed or hidden and the cover of Chi“. Hence the dig at the journalist: “We can say that Beasts is a program of interviews in which the truly ferocious thing is above all the ambition of whoever hosts it. Fagnani is a journalist and what matters to her is not so much that the program is enjoyable in its entirety but that it is ‘newsworthy’or that its guests say something that will then be relaunched by sites, social networks and newspapers”.
Read also: Beasts, red light censorship: what they didn’t air
Analyzing the entire broadcast, the columnist goes so far as to state that “the interviewee is the least valued element, paradoxically: his story as a whole is not interested, an unedited portrait does not come out. Above all, there is the evident urgency of presenter to snatch a catchphrase. In short, Beasts is a program designed for enhance the personality of the interviewer: you go there to let the presenter win”. A real slam that, however, Rai 2 viewers do not agree with.
