Sucking MPs, not except ponds Shake up the alliance, set up the battle.?
note – Academic Opinion on the Case of the Suction Phenomenon Members of the coalition government will become a problem after the election especially political polarization or not
Wanwichit Boonprong
Faculty of Political Science, Rangsit University
must be separated into two parts In the first part, it has been accepted for a long time that the party with the power to suck will, with any trick or agreement, the MPs who are willing to be sucked in may find offers and currents of political parties that have issued invitation cards for them. go live with There is a chance to be a government or have a chance to win an election because it is a political campaign in an election field that is easy to campaign. which is normal for a long time A political party that can do this must have the resources in terms of budget or flow to win political victories.
But at the moment, there is a question or objection in terms of political etiquette because as usual, in the case of a coalition, the government will be the phenomenon that the person wishes to move out of the original political parties, already conflicting as the original capital. But those who do not have conflicts are secretly attracted or secretly contacted without the knowledge of the current political party.
Therefore, it truly destroys political alignment or etiquette. In the past, as we used to understand, it may absorb the strength and reduce the political competition of opponents, such as the ruling party to pull. MPs from the opposition party or reduce the power of rivals in the election field
At the same time, political parties like that try to suck. a large number of MPs because they aim to win the election Sometimes it makes me forget to ignore the word political etiquette. Especially the number of political parties There are not many MPs left and they are pushed out again.
Of course, the reaction against it would already be twice as strong. For example, in the case of the Chart Thai Pattana Party (SRTP) that criticized the Ruam Thai Sang Chart Party (RTSR). g. act
Regarding political polarization, one must understand that sometimes we should not cling to political ideology. Because in the end, politicians will forget the word political ideology.
But will take the word benefit and bargaining power to cover immediately instead and will come and explain to the people that the country cannot move Therefore choose to lead to make the country peaceful.
That is to be invited to join the government. So if a political party with numbers A sufficiently large number of MPs have bargaining power that they can beckon or pressure other political parties. join the government
Most of which, of course, rarely anyone refuses. Unless it is a serious and ongoing conflict in the electoral field. And I think during this time the suction MPs will continue to have opportunities. Because everyone looks in the same direction that it is highly possible that General Prayut Chan-ocha, Prime Minister and Minister of Defense will choose to dissolve the parliament rather than complete the term
Therefore, the dissolution of the parliament will open the way for MPs can move to another political party within 30 days, which is equal to what I think. Gen. Prayut chose to dissolve the parliament because the number of suction numbers or the names of MPs flowing to the RRT is still not the number that I think the leaders or Gen. Prayuth was satisfied with the numbers he saw today. Therefore, choosing to dissolve parliament in order to want to hope that there will be a quantity MPs from other political parties flows into merger with the Royal Thai Navy
I think that in the end, political parties that have been treated like this must sue society and people. Don’t ignore them. They must be the spokesperson for the inconspicuousness of political parties that use higher powers in advancing into that political party’s space. Especially small political parties, regardless of any political party. should maintain identity or political ideology in a local style should not be swallowed up by a large political party
Treenate Sarapong
Faculty of Law Ubon Ratchathani University
History may have to note that this was the era of the most displaced party of all. MPs for various reasons
Either because of the wound, he had to move to a party that could be in the government. or funds used for elections Or move because of dissatisfaction with executives who have a monopoly of power, similar to the Political Bureau or Politburo in socialist regimes. Or move the party because they want to work with a political party which is the ruling party. Of course, the above reasons may be self-driven. MPs themselves caused the transfer of the party.
In terms of political parties, they set different goals. Like the Pride Thai Party, it may hope that the number MPs are the driving force for the leader of the party to become prime minister. or Palang Pracharat Party may need a number enough MPs to form a government Or the Ruam Thai Sang Chart Party may hope enough MPs to nominate the Prime Minister
Therefore, the fact that various parties are still attracting MPs reflects the lack of readiness or number of MPs. Not enough MPs to reach the stars Which this suction power is a pull from the side of the political party
Both driving force – suction power causing a large number of party transfers and complexity became a new tradition of political society reflecting the phenomenon that the popularity of the person is greater than that of the party This means that even if a person moves to a party, the people will always choose the person before them. even if the party is not favored therefore showing the picture “The MP I love but belongs to the party I hate.”
Therefore, if parties can pull MPs or big houses of each province into the party, it may help to get the number of MPs, but may not guarantee the partylist score. Because the partylist score is important in the image of the people.
Suction, of course. MPs who can absorb are satisfied. The sucked party would be dissatisfied. But whether to cry out in pain or not depends on the skill of each person.
Therefore, the image of General Prawit Wongsuwan from the Palang Pracharat Party who is hurt more than anyone else. from the suction power of Bhumjaithai Party But still focusing on the image that conceals the inside story from being released to the public very well
When asked whether it would reach the point of preventing political polarization or not. I see that it probably won’t be that much because sucking each other seems to be normal. And political handshake depends on whether the current interests fit or not. If you agree, you can hold hands.
Thai political history has proven many times that there are no permanent friends and permanent enemies.
Wanchai Chuengwibulsathit
independent academician
Absorption of MPs into political parties or prominent politicians who have the opportunity to be elected into the main political parties Especially political parties that have the opportunity to form a government. a lot happened I think it’s not something that just happened in Thai political parties. And in the future, it may even be Thai political culture.
But should maintain some political etiquette. should go and do it secretly
pulling MPs from political parties In principle All MPs must perform legislative duties. Do not take care of the people But this era makes us have to question whether we want to be What are MPs going for?
By the fact that it happened because MPs were tied to the power of the executive branch. Especially if any group has 4-5 MPs in hand, they may be promoted to be assistant ministers or 8-9 MPs may be elected as ministers. I don’t see which party sucks. How many MPs do you get?
but sees that if any party has political readiness Or having political power, you have to do with this, that is, try to get as many MPs into your hands as possible. because every minute counts If delayed, other parties will suck all MPs.
However, whether MPs will be elected or not must involve the people as well. especially those MPs who change parties frequently Should I be elected to the House of Assembly? or select new people Go into the council to make changes and new things happen.
Will the ruling parties absorb MPs among themselves, will it affect the ruling coalition in the future or not? As for politics in Thailand, it’s like a big stage play. There are both protagonist roles. hero’s assistant Maybe a scammer And come back to be a hero again There was an endless circulation. If it’s useful, exchange it back and forth. Unless there is a real disagreement. Until causing a clear polarization Probably won’t join the slaughter together.
about future politics I hope that the Election Commission or ECT will educate the public a lot. including pointing out the roles and responsibilities of MPs The important point is that if there is a clear separation of the executive branch and the legislative branch. along with presenting a list of executives clearly so that the people can choose the prime minister correctly And get the management who announced the list as well sucking problem MPs will be greatly reduced. Good results will get quality politicians to work because MPs already know that they will go to the legislative branch.
If asked if there will be political institutions Because political parties have been moved to chaos In this regard, I think that, as I have said, is without merit. no political etiquette believe that Thai politics has reached a certain point Maybe someone will ask to change the law. ask for rules Or people can’t see politics like this. It may be possible to compile a list to request a law amendment. according to the constitutional right to request a law amendment admitted that sucking MPs today are more violent than any past era.
to fix the problem MPs to have morality and political etiquette. must depend on education because it will be sustainable and long government agencies, educational agencies It should teach everyone to be politically conscious. Accept that it can’t be done in the short term.
However, if you don’t do it at all, you’ll lose the opportunity. If all citizens had correct political knowledge when stepping into MPs will have political consciousness. Or the people will be able to choose good and knowledgeable people to work in the council. will have a positive effect on the nation
Read interesting news:
