This Tuesday, the Minister of Social Development, Giorgio Jacksonreported that iwill invoke the previous question so that the constitutional accusation promoted by the bench of the Republican Party against him is discarded and it is not discussed, basically, in the Chamber of the Chamber of Deputies and Deputies.
In this sense, the previous question is a deductible tool only for the defense and indicates that the CA does not meet the requirements that the Constitution indicates. In turn, it requires the vote of the majority of the deputies present in the room, and if it is approved, the libel will remain as not filed.
Let us remember that the action points to alleged pressures that the ex-seremi would have received from the portfolio, Patricia Hidalgo, to vote in favor of some projects in the portfolio. On the other hand, the libel also points to infractions or non-execution of the Constitution and the laws in matters related to the purchase of indigenous lands and the operation of local services for Children.
In relation to the above, Jackson stated: “We have the arguments available, the public will be able to see how this is an accusation that lacks a legal basis and that, at least, having reviewed it completely and having listened to the different experts who presented it to the commission, we are very convinced of the underlying arguments.
“At least we have tried to ensure that none (of the parliamentarians) does not have these arguments before them”he insisted.
