Away from mainstream media coverage, like without censorship again and again he reportedthe elaboration of the Corona policy.
justification for restrictions on freedom
A central question that has so far remained unanswered is whether the largely repressive corona measures, which have also restricted fundamental rights and freedoms, including vaccination, have brought the benefit that could justify them.
One deals with this question Study. The authors come to the conclusion that neither the “lockdowns” nor the vaccination campaigns have had a significant positive impact on the coronavirus situation. The success of the measures should be reflected in the corona mortality figures. Countries with restrictive measures should have low numbers of corona deaths, countries with loose measures should have high numbers.
Comparison of data from 108 countries
The scientists evaluated data from 108 countries, taking into account the state of health care, annual income, obesity prevalence, geographical parameters, but also corona tests per inhabitant, etc.
Especially the effects of vaccination against the coronavirus were examined, looking at countries with insignificant vaccination rates and countries with the highest vaccination rates.
“Strategy Failed”
And these couldn’t be worse: According to the study, the higher the coronavirus vaccination rates in a country, the more people have died from the coronavirus. Also completely ineffective were the “lockdowns”, the mandatory masks, contact bans, etc. That’s why the authors also title their study:
Global outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic: the analysis of a failed strategy
