For example, after Hadamczik’s performance on Wednesday, former hockey player and now TV commentator Jakub Koreis chimed in, tweeting: “Did the executive committee know anything about it? Seriously? It’s hard to imagine such tunnels happening in the union (according to AH) and the executive committee doesn’t know about it. It won’t be presented this way because Alois Hadamczik has to get along with VV? He could hardly ask their members to approve his visions and plans if he threw them under the bus now”.
Similarly, Czech TV hockey commentator Ondřej Zamazal publicly asked on Twitter: “The executive committee had no idea. What is such a VV for? Or don’t we want to throw it around?” Sport.cz also asked similar questions in his commentary.
However, Petr Dědek, owner of non-league Pardubice, immediately called for the dissolution of the executive committee. “It is inconceivable that those responsible for billionaire damages remain in office. The president of the union is obliged to recover damages from these people as well.”
Hadamczik already explained on Wednesday that he had to trust the documents and that he found no errors or approvals of non-standard payments in the minutes of the executive committee. It is strange, however, that one member of the committee is, for example, Daniel Sadil, the head of the Litoměřice hockey team, about which Hadamczik did not leave a dry thread and said that extra millions were paid by the union.. .
I didn’t defend VV, I just stated that there was nothing official about it in the records. Whether VV members are legal representatives and share responsibility is a different matter. The police have already requested an investigation. If the criminal complaint filed by P. Dědek is insufficient, I am not against filing a new one.
— Alois Hadamczik (@alois_hadamczik) December 16, 2022
“I didn’t protect the executive board. Whether the members are legal representatives and have shared responsibilities is a different matter,” he said now. She also added that the police have already requested the results of the audit. And he is no longer so adamant not to file any criminal charges against the perpetrators, as he stated on Wednesday And that it is “unnecessary” because Petr Dědek had already filed it earlier. “If the criminal complaint filed by Petr Dědek was insufficient, I am not against filing a new one.”
Hadamczik also responded during the “afternoon tweet” to his predecessor Tomáš Král, who ironically commented on the published audit on Wednesday and noted that union people spent money from company cards on luxury items at a shop on Pařížská street in Prague. Král told ČTK: “I think the whole event is worthy of Hadamczik. And it amazes me how some people eat it. But it is typical of his expression that he always says A, but forgets to say B. used the credit card for purchases in Pařížský, it was only for union-related purchases. I would have to be a fool to pay for it myself”.
And Hadamczik wrote: “If Mr. Král says that I only claim A, then in January I will tell him B from the accounting documents.”