Home » News » The response of the PD to the PDIP attack “SBY experience with cheating”

The response of the PD to the PDIP attack “SBY experience with cheating”

Jakarta

The chairman of the Democratic Party’s upper house, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, said senior PDIP politician Panda Nababan (SBY) like having experience with cheating when mentioning that there is an attempt so that the presidential election of 2024 is only followed by 2 pairs of candidates. The Democratic Party rejected the PDI-P attack.

Panda Nababan expressed this in a Perspective Competition with the theme ‘Is there a scenario where’ they ‘failed to win the presidential election?’ that went on the air detik.com in collaboration with Total Politics, Wednesday (9/21/2022). Panda said he was sad when he heard SBY’s statement. He felt that SBY was very eloquent in conveying the potential for election fraud.

“I am frank as far as I understand, I felt it (SBY) talking is sad. Because of what? Looks like she’s admitting what he did, apparently. It means how eloquent it is that there is a scam, there is this. As fluent as he is familiar with him, “Panda said.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Swipe to resume content

“It means that if you look at his words, it looks like he already has experience. There is experience,” he added.

Panda then spoke of ‘uniqueness’ in the Democratic Party. Uniqueness is linked to the democratic vote during the 2009 elections.

“This is a party for me as a party person, who has also started a party. The SBY party, frankly, is an interesting and unique thing for me. Babies can skyrocket to number one, high. (Later the second election) Yes, that’s how it is relatively time-consuming. It’s short, you know. And in the history of the party there is none, “said Panda.

“There was a history of this party in the past when Golkar in power skyrocketed. That and the data I have with me, number 1 was in 2009 with 148 seats in the DPR, then in 2014 it became number 4, then became number 7. So number 1 completely new, so this, “he explained.

Democrats Do

Also present at the discussion was the head of the BPOKK DPP Democratic Party Herman Khaeron. He defended SBY. Herman explained that the Democratic Party won in the 2009 election due to the influence of SBY, which ran for president.

“This is a direct presidential election. This is where the function is, this is where the function is there is a kotelepek, when there are candidates for the presidency and for the vice presidency, the party is finally nominated there, besides the people respond also to the people programs launched by Pak SBY, ”said Herman.

Herman then explained SBY’s statement on the dishonest and fair context. He said what SBY told him was potential fraud.

“So the context of cheating is not actually cheating, the context can be unfair or dishonest. Because there is a setting to become only 2 candidates. So it won’t happen then vote fraud, what kind of cheater, it’s not the context, “he explained.

As for SBY, who was considered fluent in conveying the violation, Herman also provided a defense. He said there were only 2 candidates who received information on presidential candidates SBY It is valid.

“It was broadcast first, information was relayed, and then it was made clear that this information was valid. Yes, it was relayed to the executives,” Herman said.

Read more on the next page.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.