In the first episode of TV 2’s big new adventure “Forræder” last Friday, there were influences Kristin Gjelsvik (36) and actor Hina Zaidi (37) that had to leave the field almost before the adventure began.
– He came home alone in chaos
On Friday, two new actors had to leave the show, namely the TV profile Hallvard Flatland (65) – which was eliminated by traitors Jonas Lihaug (33), Cathrine Fossum (44) and Jørn Lier Horst (52). – before another TV profile, Christer Falck (53) received the highest number of votes in the council chamber, and was therefore sent home by all the voters.
–
Out of 20 entrants, four loyalists have so far been sent home, meaning the traitors have had a great start to the game.
– He played alone
For those who haven’t seen “Traitor”, it briefly explains about 20 famous people – gamers – who move into Anders Jahre’s mansion in Sandefjord. Here they must complete a series of missions and challenges to build as large a prize pool as possible.
– It’s hard to start over
At the same time, three of the players are chosen as traitors. Nobody, except the three themselves, knows who the traitors are. The traitors are tasked with misleading and eliminating the loyal, while the loyal are tasked with revealing which three are not playing on the same team as them.
–
– I really like Christer and I wish he was there longer. Because I had a lot of fun with him. But the fact, I think, is that he has been playing with himself a bit, one of the traitors himself, Lihaug, tells Dagbladet.
– Things happened
Viewers may have noticed that there was a strange atmosphere before, during and after Falck’s repatriation. The former “Robinson” host got the most votes by far, while many who voted for him stressed that they were far from certain that the 53-year-old was a traitor – but that it was a moment of turmoil in the group. .
– This has never happened before
But we have to believe that the reason for some was something that wasn’t shown on TV.
The so-called “council room”, the heart of the game and where the participants have to cast their vote for who they consider a traitor, is in fact directly inside one of the living rooms of the house where the production took place.
Before the attendees sat around the large table in the room, they must have had to walk around the house, because the TV crew wanted extra photos of them.
– There were things that happened behind the camera that were a little hard to cover for production, Lihaug tells Dagbladet.
Chaotic
During this session, the “game” did not exist in that sense: it was said that participants were told that they were not allowed to communicate, that they were not allowed to try to influence others in the voting process that was to take place a little more. late.
According to Lihaug, Falck must have done just that, even though there were several “gambling officers” watching.
–
– Yes, he started whispering and shouting and tried to mobilize to get one or the other participant out, I think it was Erlend (Mørch, 28, journ.anm.). He caused havoc – at one time it was illegal to do so. That was partly why it ended up like this, I think, he says.
In tears after the “Farmmen” topic.
So, everything must have been turned upside down.
– It was an extremely chaotic situation. There was a great debate in the boardroom, where everyone turned to Christer. But I was a traitor and I knew I had a shield to use against him if things went that way. But I was sorry for him, I did.
– Cursed
He continues:
– People were pretty mad at him when we walked in, because he tried to turn everything upside down. We wanted the debate to be the opposite of what happened the day before and in the first episode, or that it was a structured and open debate. He opposed that idea.
–
The 33-year-old points out that Falck has never been rude to anyone.
– No, he didn’t say anything rude or mean. She was just trying to make her way to someone she wanted us to vote for, in a slightly fraudulent way. But as a traitor he was absolutely beautiful to me.
– Wrong
Falck has a completely different version of what took place. He tells Dagbladet that what happened was “completely natural” and that things turned out well in the end, before he had to pack his bags and leave.
– People had decided that Erlend should go home, and I followed him – completely spineless. When Erlend realized that I was going to vote for him, he launched a counter-offensive and convinced all the same people to vote for me. If the break when we sat down in the waiting room had lasted five and not ten minutes, Erlend would probably have smoked, he believes.
– Some believe that you whispered, whispered and pressed before entering the boardroom, and that this is what made you fall. It’s right?
– No it is not true. The people I worked with told me to vote for Erlend just before we went to the boardroom. I asked Sandra (Spjelkavik, 32, ed) who we should vote for and she said “Erlend”.
He launched a counterattack
Mørch confirms what Falck says that it was he who persuaded everyone to vote for the former “Robinson” host.
– TV 2 considered a police report
– I guess what happened is that I went around and felt peace and no danger and thought everyone would vote for Tonje (Frigstad, 22, ed). But then it transpired that he must have shed a few tears in front of some of the attendees – which I didn’t understand – but it made the wind turn a bit.
The 28-year-old explains that people had begun to sympathize with Frigstad, and therefore decided to vote for Mørch.
–
– Christer said everyone should vote for me and I would have fun if I changed my mind. I asked if he would vote for me too, and he said yes, so I just said ok, then I’ll vote for you and make everyone else do the same.
Then he says he clapped his hands to get the room’s attention.
The detail attracts attention
– I will vote for Christer and warmly welcome everyone to do the same, let’s vote for Christer.
Mørch thought that if people voted for him rather than Tonje, because they feared she would be angry, then he could shift those votes to Christer.
–
– He was someone everyone was happy to vote for, regardless of whether he was loyal or a traitor.
Glad it was over
However, Falck believes he has received an inordinate amount of blame for Erlend being sent home “according to plan”.
– It was one I liked best, so there were many more I wanted before. But I didn’t want to take part in those discussions.
Dried up support
According to Falck, he did not take repatriation very seriously.
– I’m glad it passed quickly, so I can get back to my books and record releases. For me, it doesn’t matter if I finish second or 17th. Either win or not.
–
– This was a competition in which a person like me could never win. The ones that go far in a program like “Traitor” – the ones whose names you don’t know.
–