It will be talked about for a long time, that’s for sure. Massa’s decision to cancel AC Milan’s goal Kessie in the Milan-Napoli final, after watching the episode in slow motion, infuriated Pioli and the Rossoneri fans and decided the result of the big match at San Siro. From yesterday at 22.30 there is no talk of anything else but it was right not validate the network of the Ivorian? All the moviolisti da Casarin in Marelli with Cesari who finds another slow motion case in his speech on Pressing.
For Casarin, Kessie’s goal could be validated
The former designator Paolo Casarin in the Corriere della Sera expresses his doubts: “The Rossonero is on the ground, rather than taking part in the action he seems to suffer from the position of the defender above him. As early as June 14, 1924, the Ifab decided that «a player who is in offside does not commit any infraction, unless he disturbs an opponent and does not take part in the game. In these cases, by interfering in the ongoing action, he must be punished ».
It is the decisive point of the goal canceled against Milan and the one canceled by Irrati in Atalanta-Roma on Saturday. Irrati did not see the offside of Palomino and conceded the goal. In the verification Nasca (Var) caught the offside and the modest activity of Palomino against Cristante; Irrati canceled the goal. The two referees should not be punished, as we already read: they just had to divide up the tasks better “
Marelli partially reverses on Kessie’s goal
A hot Dazn Marelli gets unbalanced and says: “The episode is very special. In Bergamo, Palomino moved his hand towards Cristante, creating contact. In this case there was no contact, Giroud is on the ground. The on field review is correct, had to judge Pulp, but it is not a contrast like that of Bergamo. It was created because Giroud could not be anywhere else. The offside is there, but the debate remains on the impact because Giroud could not have been elsewhere “
Then on his youtube channel he corrects himself and says: “Massa’s performance was exceptional, the best you can remember in years but on the episode of the goal I was too hasty in judging live. There is a Giroud foul on Juan Jesus but Massa didn’t see it, he only saw the offside even if Giroud doesn’t touch the ball that reaches Kessie who scores ”.
“L‘on field review is a must, seeing the images we see that Giroud from the ground does not cause any contact with Juan Jesus. Did it bother him? To hear him, yes but in reality he has not created impediments, if I were to say that it is regular I would not be objective, it is an episode so extreme that any decision would have sparked controversy. I would not have wanted to be in Massa’s place, I say that it could have been canceled but also no, after many hours I still have very clear ideas “
Finally Graziano Cesari that finds an irregularity on the network of Diamond: “Napoli’s goal comes from a corner that came after a throw-in in favor of Milan given to Napoli. Lozano touches with his right foot anticipating Ballo Touré and the assistant probably does not see the ball because he is jumping. It is an unfortunate mistake, if the goal had not arrived we would not be here talking about a lineout “.
ATHLETES
– .
