I will visit the Santa Lucia airport. And the bad guys against El Universal, according to El Universal

Today at ten o’clock in the morning I will arrive at Felipe Angeles International Airport located in Santa Lucía, municipality of Zumpango, State of Mexico.

The journalist will accompany me Nancy gomez, from SDPNoticias, and the aeronautical engineer Elic jacob herrera.

Nancy, a professional reporter, will have time to compose her impressions of the new airport. Elic, a specialist in aeronautics, agreed to be with us so that we could ask the technically correct questions.

I know that yesterday the Lord was at the AIFA Ricardo Salinas Pliego, owner of TV Azteca, who was positively impressed by the work that will soon open. Maybe I will agree with him, or maybe not. This afternoon, no later than tomorrow, I will be in a position to give an opinion, with hard information, on the quality of one of the great projects of the president’s six-year term Andrés Manuel López Obrador.

With the support of the aeronautical engineer Nancy will ask some of these questions, or all if there is enough time, to those responsible for the work, of course if they allow it:

• What studies were done for the construction of the airport?
• Were the orographic conditions of the area and the proximity to the Mexico City airport considered?
• Did you have advice from international consultants on the airport design?
• In how many stages is the total construction of the airport considered and what passenger and cargo capacity will have?
• Were the needs of the airline industry, in airport planning?
• How much is the construction of this airport costing?
• How many projects does the construction of the AIFA?
• What are the main technical characteristics of the airport (number of runways, taxiways, terminal building, fuels, air traffic, platforms, fire fighting services, others), in terms of design and materials used?
• Is the construction of the airport authorized by the civil aviation authority?
• Does the construction meet international standards and why?
• How many people work in the construction of the AIFA and what specialty do they have?
• Is the Mexican civil aviation authority, or some other authority, supervising the works?
• What progress is the construction of the works and if it will really be operating by March 21, 2022?
• What important work remains to be done?
• What are the works being carried out to connect the airport with CDMX and other states of the republic?
• Are there spaces in the building for passenger airlines, cargo, general aviation, helicopter?
• Have loading facilities been considered in the construction?
• What will the preventive maintenance of the infrastructure cost?
• Will the airport have any certification or validation to be able to operate?
• Will the airport be international in nature?
• What type of aircraft can operate?
• Will simultaneous operations be possible on the AIFA runways?
• Do the national or international passenger or cargo airlines have any intention of operating in the AIFA?
• How many contact and remote positions for passenger and cargo aircraft will have?
• What hours of operation will it have?
• Will you have any authorized special operations?
• What progress does the design of aircraft departures and arrivals in the airspace have?
• Is the design of aircraft departures and arrivals safe in the airspace?
• Will flights be delayed due to their proximity to the CDMX airport?
• How long will it take to passenger to be documented?
• What technological facilities for the passenger will the AIFA to carry out your documentation?
• What equipment in the security filters will there be?
• Who will be in charge of airport security?
• In customs and migration, what space or equipment will there be so as not to delay the departure of international passengers?
• Will there be passenger amenities in the departure and arrival clinics and lounges?
• What will be the costs of the YOUR and parking lots for cars?
• Will the costs for an airline be higher than in the AICM?
• Will the operation of the AIFA?
• Who will authorize the operating fees for the new airport?
• Will you operate private flights?

Speaking of private flights, let’s talk now about The universal and its owner …

As it is in the public domain, an absolutely negative incident related to his wedding in Guatemala, forced Santiago Nieto to present his resignation to the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Ministry of Finance.

That incident was related to the seizure by Guatemalan authorities of $ 35,000 in cash that one of the guests at the party was carrying on a private plane, Juan Francisco Ealy Ortiz, owner of The universal.

Today, in the front column of that newspaper, Low Reserve, instead of admitting the error of Mr. Ealy, it is said that everything has been a conspiracy against such journalistic companies. Let’s see their arguments, laughable:

• For starters, the editors of Ealy speak of a “Pre-built scandal in Guatemala against Nieto”, whatever this means.
• The wedding of Santiago Nieto with the electoral counselor Carla Humphrey “It attracted the anger of several actors who have troubles with them, but also against other perhaps involuntary protagonists of the event, such as Paola Felix Diaz, now ex-secretary of Tourism of the capital ”.
• One of the plot operators says The universal, is the PRI mayor of Cuajimalpa, Adrian Rubalcava, who is flatly accused of having been the original source of the information he received Darius Celis, the journalist who made the sainete known on social networks. What evidence is provided to demonstrate the above? None.
• For The universal there has been a war of fake news. Seriously? Yesterday Ealy Ortiz’s own newspaper acknowledged that he was traveling with $ 35,000. Today suggests that everything is false. A little logic, please.
• Assuming conspiracy orchestrated by the mayor of Cuajimalpa participated “publications close to the 4T”, “lambiscones a modo” and “a newspaper – evidently Reform– whose family that owns it retains strange ties to the sect More”.
• According The universal the newspaper Reform said there were a thousand guests at the wedding of grandson and Humphrey. The editors of Ealy misread: in Reform it was said that there were 300 attendees at the celebration.
• Dice The universal that there were no imported wines at the wedding. Reform He published that champagne was drunk and in other spaces the version ran that it was served with Mexican wine, which in Guatemala is necessarily imported, unless it had been smuggled in a private aircraft. And no, I don’t accuse the owner of the centennial newspaper of anything.
• Another participant in the plot is, according to E’s versionl Universal, Mrs Carolina Viggiano, federal deputy and candidate for the PRI candidacy in Hidalgo.
• The universal adds two more accomplices to the plot against Ealy Ortiz —and, incidentally, against Santiago Nieto—, Julio Scherer Ibarra, former legal adviser to the presidency, and the attorney general Alejandro Gertz Manero.
• A plot against The universal which is a “prelude to the battle of all battles”, the presidential election of 2024. In other words, he has attacked Ealy Ortiz for his enormous political influence that will be fundamental when deciding the candidacies of all parties for the big.

In an article published in Nexus —Reproduced in SDPNoticias with your permission – the analyst Jorge G. Castañeda wonders who leaked the information that caused the ruin of Santiago Nieto and of Paola Felix Diaz and that, without a doubt, has seriously hit the prestige of the owner of The universal.

Castañeda himself responds: The leaker is “perhaps —it is just a hypothesis— a Mexican official who attended the wedding, in the company of his wife, the governor of Campeche. That official, by name Romeo Ruiz Armento, is the ambassador of Mexico in Guatemala, and his obligation is to report this type of event to his boss ”.

Who is the head of the ambassador? Obvious, the foreign secretary, Marcelo Ebrard Casaubón, alias MEC.

Jorge G. Castañeda He thinks that way because they could only have leaked the documents of the seizure of Ealy’s money, who had them, yes, like the Mexican ambassador in Guatemala.

Such an ambassador, as is his obligation, should have immediately reported the incident to Mexico. There is in the WED a line open 24 hours every day of the year for such cases. And, judging by the approach that was initially given to the scandal – hitting a CDMX official, Paola Félix Díaz -, what it was about was damaging the image of Claudia Sheinbaum. This woman reacted quickly and demanded the resignation of Paola, who thus paid for her recklessness.

If the initials appear there GUY It will be more than a coincidence because not only did the complete film have a subordinate of Ebrard, the aforementioned ambassador, but the wedding was attended by one of the politicians closest to the chancellor, Javier López Casarín.

How sorry he must be Santiago Nieto having invited the owner of The universal, who had the bad idea of ​​traveling by plane for his personal use with more money than allowed. This fact was the origin of the absurd romantic-political interlude that left a civil servant who did his job well (Nieto) and an effective civil servant (Paola) without a job.

What follows is to wish luck to Pablo Gomez at the head of the Financial Intelligence Unit. And hope that he does not have the idea of ​​getting married this six-year term. He’s not of age and I don’t even know if he’s married, but in matters of the heart who’s feeling old for a new party romance in Antigua, Guatemala, or any other wonderful place?

–