YouTube to remove vaccine misinformation videos – IT Pro – News

Now YT is of course not the ideal source to witness a counter-sound to the vaccine (because they may also be there, because that’s how a democracy works). What I do find serious about this message is that a multinational that claims to have or had freedom of expression is going to determine what disinformation is about the vaccine. Because do their doctors or experts employ them to test this misinformation?

Please let’s be a little realistic about this. This is a vaccine that normally had the protocol for decades to test it extensively in phases and to document the advantages and disadvantages in those phases. Normally, that means at least seven years. Now there are vaccines on the market that have been produced in less than a year and which have already been documented in advance that none of the pharmaceutical companies can be held liable for the consequences. Legally, this means that it is not possible to be certain in advance whether the vaccine also works or whether it can have some adverse effects on the person himself.

It is somewhat admirable that this information (the side effects) may not be discussed in a dialogue on a medium that values ​​or used to value freedom of expression. Because why can’t we talk about the possible adverse effects? It is already well known that it can cause heart failure in young people, cause blood clots and other strange side effects. This has already been extensively reported by the media, the OMT and the cabinet.

So what is disinformation and how is it tested? Because someone who has an autoimmune disease is already advised not to just take this vaccine. For example, my mother has bone and muscle rheumatism and is advised by her rheumatologist not to take the vaccine. But now she is no longer allowed to participate in the coffee hour and she is no longer allowed to play shuffleboard, because there is no vaccine. And that would be a bad thing, wouldn’t it?

And no, I am not an anti vaxxer, everyone should do what they see best for themselves in this predicament. But I do wish to hear each other about something that has an impact on my body and environment. Because my body, I only have one of those.

–