Nowadays, education seems to have forgotten the dimension of the struggle. However, the exit from the state of minority comes at this price. If it forms the horizon of man, it is by no means certain. And now that, failing to face educational asceticism, the very one that makes the edge when we would like it to overflow, everyone experiences the saturation of the senses, believing to escape through such entertainment constrained adaptability. Or how to create an entirely artificial autistic territoriality because we have not been able to live up to the aggressiveness of an ego that has not learned the severity of individuation. No one wants to live up to the aggressiveness of the individuals we have become. Parental idleness is moreover only the particular name of a more general idleness, which affects all the actors of society, in the apprehension of their responsibility (up to what point does this life which is theirs concern them? -she ?).
This “appearance of dressage” is just another name for the discipline, something that seemed obvious to learn in the Kantian age, and which was by no means compatible with dressage. “One can either confine oneself to training man, to train him, to instruct him mechanically, or to really enlighten him. We train dogs, horses, we can also train men. […] But the training does not provide for everything, it is important in priority that the children learn to think. »This appearance of dressage then presented itself as falling short of education …
–
–
