Professor Florin Nicoară is again, on Friday, the director of the “Emanuil Gojdu” National College, after the Bihor Tribunal admitted his request to suspend the decision of the School Inspectorate, by which he was dismissed.
“I think justice has done justice. The abuse of the inspector general and the team on the board of directors was at least set aside today, because it is not normal to destabilize a school around exams just to get revenge on its leader. or on the school itself or, who knows, to invoke some reasons that have nothing to do with law and normality “, said for AGERPRES, professor Nicoară.
Even if it is not final, the sentence is enforceable. According to the decision published on the court’s website, the judges ordered the suspension of decision 3867 of May 21, by which Nicoară was dismissed, until the ruling of the court of first instance.
“I considered, like the whole college, that the decision to dismiss the director Nicoară is illegal and unfair. The Bihor Court did nothing but give us justice. I, as a parent, hope that this decision will not be challenged, because it was made “Bad for the school. As a lawyer, I have no emotions. I have no illusions that I know she will be attacked. The sentence, I think, must remain in the same form, because it is legal. The dismissal decision was abusive.” Just to give you an example of what it means to disrupt the activity of the high school, the School Inspectorate has seconded three inspectors to help the deputy principal appointed to lead the high school! During this period, when Gojdu College is a Bac center, Capacity center, exam for the 5th grade, the logistics are infernal and must be ensured. They detached three inspectors, which is the night of the mind, “the director ‘s lawyer, Bogdan Bodea, told AGERPRES.
The School Inspectorate accused the principal Nicoară of allowing the classes to be held online one day a week and the classes to last 40 minutes, with breaks of five minutes each, given that the students always wore masks.
The lawyer explained that, first of all, Article 15 of Joint Order 3235 expressly provides that pre-university education units may issue their own rules regulating measures complementary to those provided by the normative act, a legal provision ignored by the head of the CSI. The online day as well as the duration of the class are an integral part of the timetable submitted to the CSI. The decision regarding the development of the courses belongs to the Board of Directors of the College, and not to the director of the school.
“Mr. Blage (Inspector General of Schools, no.) Instead of challenging that decision in court and upholding the rule of law (as we did), he threw the entire responsibility on the principal and dismissed him abusively. The online day allows teachers who have health problems to protect themselves and there are 9. There are also regulated special situations such as the second foreign language (for which students from different classes are grouped, depending on the language they choose) or the use of computer labs that are shared by all classes of the college.The inspectorate acknowledged, pointed out, that it did not foresee all the consequences of the dismissal decision.Personal, I repeat, I am firmly convinced that it is a fair decision and I want to thank them and to the other fellow lawyers who supported this step of ours, said lawyer Bodea.
– .
