Result of the statement: ‘The car remains a cash cow’ | What you say

One respondent says: “It is fair to pay for road pricing that frequent drivers have to pay more as they consume more. It is not fair that electric drivers do not do that and also receive a subsidy. Even people who do not have a car contribute to this through the tax. ” Another opponent of subsidies on electric driving: “Owners of – much heavier – electric cars should actually pay more tax.”

Most respondents consider road pricing to be fairer than settling the costs of driving through excise duties on petrol. Someone outlines: “Fuel is really not going to get cheaper, although they promise of course.” A reaction, referring to a measure by former Prime Minister Kok from 1991: “First, get that Kwartje van Kok off the gasoline prices. This road pricing will only increase costs for the ordinary citizen, who will not see anything of it anymore. ”

Nevertheless, a large number of voters are still opposed to road pricing. Many do not think that a fair system can be devised for road pricing. “The car remains a cash cow for the government, it is never fair,” said one respondent. Another reaction: “This will only work for the Randstad, where distances are shorter and there is an alternative with public transport.”

A narrow majority is in favor of making business drivers pay more for car use. “I have to travel a lot for work. Do I have to pay even more in order to earn my living? That way I have nothing left at all ”, complains one kilometer-eater. “And what do we do with people who work night shifts and therefore cannot go to work by public transport?” Someone adds.

Whether those business drivers will be more expensive is the question. Most of the respondents believe that corona has given rise to a new perspective on commuting. An advocate of road pricing: “Corona has shown that things can be done differently. Enforce that now with measures. Such as road pricing. ”

A third of the respondents are surprised that Natuur & Milieu has joined the car lobby on this topic. One response: “If your environmental lobby gets involved in driving, then you know what time it is: pay.”

Most participants think that the lobby clubs will have their way and that a paragraph on road pricing will be included in the coalition agreement. One voter thinks it’s a bad plan: “The Netherlands is far too expensive. The costs should actually go down. ”

Most also expect that there will be a favorable regulation for electric driving. “Hopefully the e-car will also be affordable for the common man.” Despite this, almost three quarters of the voters do not think that electric driving is better than driving on fossil fuel. “It is by definition no better than fossil. The costs of the entire infrastructure of charging stations and cabling are never included in the calculations. ”

–