Multimedia author: Production
–
The jurist specified that, according to article 163 of the Electoral Code of the State of Michoacán, Morón is prevented from carrying out any electoral type act, even if he has filed appeals before the National Electoral Institute (INE)
06:45 PM 03/04/2021
Morelia, Mich., April 3, 2021.- By initiating tours of the state with the disguise of “State Coordinator of the Fourth Transformation”, Raúl Morón incurs in contempt of the electoral authority and in a new violation of the law, said this day the Doctor of Law Aniano Cabello Proudente, legal advisor to the candidate for governor of Fuerza por México.
The jurist specified that, according to article 163 of the Electoral Code of the State of Michoacán, Morón is prevented from carrying out any act of an electoral nature, even if he has filed appeals before the National Electoral Institute (INE) and the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Power of the Federation (TEPJF).
The law orders: “those proposed as candidates who are denied registration or whose candidacy is revoked may not campaign, even when the corresponding decision has been challenged.”
In electoral matters there is no protection, he said, and consequently neither the suspension of the act claimed, “having filed an appeal for review does not mean that it can continue.”
Morena has no candidate. “If Morón recovers a candidacy, it may be to relieve Félix Salgado Macedonio in Guerrero,” said Cabello Proudente and deplored that the former mayor of Morelia is endorsed by his Morena party in the tours he is making in Michoacán, since they are illegal acts.
The electoral law expert explained that Morón Orozco is flatly prevented from doing proselytizing acts, even if they are baptized with another name and that he is also obliged to account for the origin of the resources with which he moves.
As long as the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Power of the Federation does not resolve, what proceeds in accordance with the same article 163 of the Electoral Code of Michoacán, he added, is that “once the National Electoral Institute withdrew his candidacy, his party carried out a substitution, and the term that the law establishes to do so is five days after the refusal of registration or loss of the candidacy ”.
The Doctor of Law concluded by pointing out that 163 of the State Electoral Code leaves no room for doubt, once the substitute is presented, “the General Council of the Electoral Institute must decide on the new registry no later than five days after the request was submitted. corresponding and the general period of the campaigns does not vary for these reasons ”.
–
–
– .
