The whole scandal seems too “kitchen” to do someone’s job. And I think that in the end it will be much more useful for the monarchy than for Megan and Harry. This was said to bTV by the writer Maria Kasimova-Moase, commenting on the interview of the Dukes of Sussex with Oprah.
The secular chronicler Evgeni Minchev was of exactly the same opinion. He said choosing the right moment was a “civilization test” and he disapproved of Megan and Harry’s decision to give the interview just as Britain was facing Brexit, the pandemic and Prince Philip’s illness.
“When we say that there is a fairy tale here, in fact Megan Markle refutes the tale. Because she turns her over and for the first time in the history of fairy tales she turns the prince into a frog, instead of turning him from a frog into a prince “, he joked.
The two commentators, of course, also touched on racism. In an interview, Megan revealed that members of the royal family were worried about the color of Archie’s skin.
“The definition of racism is so bland and vague that we still do not know what racism is,” said Evgeni Minchev. “Megan Markle’s skin is much paler than mine when I’ve been in the sun. If no one had told me that she had such an origin, I would have thought that the poor actress had gone too far with the solarium.
The secular chronicler has repeatedly pointed out that Megan is primarily an actress and said that she is just an actress trying to play the role of a princess.
“There are many elegant mechanisms in Britain to control this attitude,” said Maria Kasimova-Moase. “So they would not allow themselves to make any claims against this woman on the basis of racism.”
– .
