The court dismissed the UDD group’s murder case. “Gen. Rom Klao – Minions”
Date 01 Feb. 2021 at 1:21 p.m.
–
The Criminal Court dismissed the UDD lawsuit. The case was filed for murder. “Gen. Rom Klao – subordinates” during the dissolution of the rally, April 10, 2010, the prosecution’s witnesses were still suspicious of lack of weight.
On February 1, 64 at the Criminal Court, Ratchadapisek Road, the court read the verdict on the criminal case, throwing bombs at a group of military personnel. The dissolution of the UDD rally, 10 April 2010, caused Gen. Romklao Thuawtham and his subordinates to die and injure.
In this case, the prosecutor of the Special Case Office 1 is the plaintiff and Mrs. Nichahiran Burana Thuwatham, the wife of Gen. Rom Klao, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against Mr. Suksaek or Sekpol Tu, 44 years old, the former Democracy Coalition Against Dictatorship (UDD). ), Mrs. Pornkamon Buachat Khao or Mrs. Kanokporn Siripunnapirat Former TV host of the Asian People Station Update, Mr. Surachai or Lang Dhevarat, UDD allegiance, was the defendant No. 1-3, Black Case No. 857/2562.
In a common offense to cause an explosion that is likely to be dangerous to others. Or other people’s property Until the cause of the death of the person And jointly support the killing and attempted others who are officers by deliberation, who buy, have, use or import firearms or ammunition Or explosives without permission of the state, sharing firearms Ammunition Or explosives
The plaintiff stated the alleged circumstances. Between 15 Nov 2009 – 20 May 2010, the UDD group gathered at the Democracy Monument to expel Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva (at that time) to resign from office until the date 7 April 2010, Mr. Abhisit declared a serious emergency in Bangkok. And issued an order to establish an emergency response center (Sor Chor Chor.) To perform the recovery of the area near Ratchadamnoen Klang Road Since Khok Wua Intersection, heading to Democracy Monument
Until April 10, 2010, the 1st and 3rd defendants together with three M.67 type grenades, each of which was financed by the second defendant. And supply bombs for The defendants had the intention of killing others by throwing 2 killing bombs at the military personnel while performing duties in front of Satriwittaya School, Dinso Road, causing Col. Rom Klao Thuawat, Deputy Chief of Staff of the 2nd Infantry Brigade to wait. A total of 5 officers died and several others were seriously injured. With the defendants denying
Today the court was taken. Mr. Suksaek and Surachai, the 1st and 3rd defendants, came from the prison and heard the verdict.
WhileThe court examined the evidence and found that the plaintiff’s testimony was suspicious. Claiming to be a follower of the defendant but has no contact phone number Unknown UDD group, no political motivation. Believe that giving both the unaware But receiving benefits from participating in the witness protection program The plaintiff’s testimony is not reliable. No listening weight And when the court considered the indictment, the defendant compared it with the case UDD terrorism Then which is the same person Same period Considered a double action Therefore dismissed the accused 1-3
Reporter reports According to the legal procedure, even though the court has dismissed the case But still a ruling of the Court of First Instance, the parties in the case can still submit an appeal within 1 month
– .
