The myths grow in the distance. In the vicinity only trains and beards grow and, depending on how close you get, it may not even be that, it is possible until you have to squint to focus, like one of those myopic chiseled who end up smiling at fate without intending it. Everything is a problem of focus, therefore, art is always close to money and power. Squinting. And vice versa, because, the history of art is, in reality, the history of propaganda, of persuasive communication, of the sale of an idea, whether this idea is Rome, the Catholic Church or a woman with a bare chest guiding to France towards barbarism. It’s the same, Until the creation of the mass media, art occupies that symbolic place, it is the conduit through which the patron uses the skill of the artisan to fix symbolic images in the people. It doesn’t matter Miguel Ángel, Velázquez or Gabarrón (uf): it’s about being close to the circles of power, just as remoras are close to sharks. It seems legitimate to me. What I am not clear about is who is the remora and who is the shark in this fable. Clear the reader the x.
The first contemporary painter is Goya. Until him, there is no concept of plastic creation as a vehicle for self-enjoyment, for oneself, as a pure means of expression, without commissions or financial objectives involved. Without propaganda. Although, now that I think about it, maybe a man – or a woman – in Altamira was a few centuries ahead of the deaf man from Fuendetodos in what would be the first graffiti in history. That graffiti is not art, all graffiti artists know, especially Paleolithic people. Anyone who wants to see graffiti as urban art is delusional. Graffiti is vandalism, and therefore, by discarding art and not considering themselves artists, they are avant-garde and are out of the caves, which makes them truly independent. Because it should be remembered that being independent is not being poor but not needing money. Therefore, there is only something more independent than a millionaire: a graffiti millionaire.
“The history of art is, in reality, the history of propaganda, persuasive communication, the sale of an idea”
–
What we are going to. Antonio Gisbert Pérez, who would later become the director of the Prado Museum, painted in 1860 his celebrated work ‘Los comuneros Padilla, Bravo y Maldonado en el gallo’. ORA well-executed and purely propagandistic work created with the sole objective of being exhibited at the National Exhibition of Fine Arts in 1860 and obtaining a gold medal, that is, to obtain money from the liberals of the government of Isabel II to use it as anti-propaganda. absolutist. Nihil novum sub sole. That of the medal of honor could not have been – conservative jury, that is to say, same propaganda, different sense – but the commotion that arose is of such caliber that it obtains that the Congress of the Deputies acquire it. And there it is, in the Portrait Gallery. By the way, it is not the only work dedicated to community members in the Carrera de San Jerónimo. In the same Session Room, in a very important place to the right of the president, there is a tombstone with the names of the community leaders. It must be so that our 31 deputies do not forget, due to disuse, that they should go to that tombstone with a ladder and stand there like Jeremiah at the Wailing Wall. Better yet, to give yourself a slap, as in the Pórtico de la Gloria.