Home » News » ‘Graduation’ nailed the former prisoner, Secondary 112, changed the lawyer, finally imprisoned, ignored Toto, accusing him of ungratefulness

‘Graduation’ nailed the former prisoner, Secondary 112, changed the lawyer, finally imprisoned, ignored Toto, accusing him of ungratefulness

30 Jan. And was attacked by criticism that he had done the 112 case, told briefly Which is also useful as This made Mr. Uthai Suwan Wiang in Roi Et Province, I was determined to do it, and in the end the case was just waiting to be sentenced to being a villager, and I never received even one baht of compensation I’m a Roi Et At that time, there was no hope. During the election period of 2019, I was also an MP and I did not respond to Mr. Toto (Mr. Piyarat Jongthep, Vivo group leader That came out to criticize Mr Karom that ungrateful) Many people commented a lot with Mr. Toto, it’s okay.

Mr. Karom also mentioned the case that Mr. Somyot Prueksakasemsuk, the leader of the 24 June Democracy group. Write an open letter to the Kao Klai Party to drive Mr. Karom out of the party that Mr Somyot was accused of 112 guilty acts in this case because Mr. Suwit Thongnuan, a lawyer, came to discuss the case together. During the trial there was Mr. Manit Jitchan Back Former Chief Justice of the Criminal Court Let’s do this case too Which Mr. Somyot said that he did not pay attention to the case This speech was damaged. He changed the lawyer. In the end, we were imprisoned. We understood compassion but did not want to retaliate. Time doctors treat patients Patients disappeared, then visit the doctor. When the lawyer complimented the win, he praised Two angles They do not respond to accusations

“I also sympathize with Khun Somyot that he’s struggling. Appreciating with an ideology But democracy has to be seen differently. About the being prosecuted, and finally, having to lose the case, there are many conditions In particular, the offense under Section 112 has a lot, because through many courts, the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court has screened. Will say that the lawyer did not do his best Do something like this but I couldn’t do it because I wanted to be famous. I made a case for the UDD leaders. At that time, it was already famous. This is because he is alluding to accuse me, but it is okay. I am now considered as a public MP. Some of them are fine, ”said the graduates.

When asked whether using M 112, we saw another problem. Are you ready to talk and change your attitude? Mr. Karom said, “I have a lot of opinions. Deep enough But did not want to explain because it affected a lot This one can tell Therefore does not change Conclude, no matter what kind of modification I am not signing. The impact, I accept. It is said that it cannot be changed. This one is principled, it is not correct, ”said Karom.

– .

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.