It is a real-time e-news that looks at the news that became hot topics on the Internet overnight.
Seol Min-seok, a famous history lecturer, was suspicious of plagiarism this time following controversy over history distortion.
Yesterday (29th), an online media reported that Seol confirmed the thesis plagiarism checking software for his thesis, which received his master’s degree from the Yonsei University Graduate School of Education in 2010, and the plagiarism rate was 52%.
In response, Seol admitted that he neglected citations and footnotes in the process of referencing other papers.
He also said that it was a terrible feeling because he did not meet the undeserved expectations and trust he had sent him.
Earlier, Seol apologized after being pointed out that the contents of his lecture in an entertainment program related to world history were pointed out with many errors.
On his YouTube channel, he argued that jazz was born after losing his original intentions, and he was criticized by music experts for disseminating false information.
—
There have also been many articles saying that an incumbent councilor in Mapo-gu, Seoul was caught meeting five or more people in a late-night party room.
That night, in front of a four-story building near Hongdae, Seoul, a patrol car was dispatched to report that there was a loud noise until late.
The top floor of this building was a party room operated by reservation without a sign, and as a result of police confirmation, 5 people had a drink after 11 o’clock.
One in this gown was the incumbent Mapo-gu.
If the party room is banned from gathering more than 5 people, a fine of less than 3 million won for the operator and less than 100,000 won for the user is imposed. He explained that he couldn’t get out while listening.
He added that he didn’t know it was a party room because there was no sign, and that it was an office.
The police said that if a complaint comes in from the ward office, it is a policy to grasp the possibility of violating the infectious disease prevention method and file a case.
—
There have also been many articles stating that Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae criticized the court judgment that stopped the disciplinary effect of Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol.
Minister Chu said yesterday through his SNS that the procedure for dismissing the request for challenge by the Prosecutors and Discipline Committee was legitimate.
The Prosecutor’s Disciplinary Act separates the quorum of decision and the quorum of decision, and decides whether or not a member is rejected with a majority attendance of members and a majority of the members present.
He added that it would be impossible for all disciplinary committees to proceed with a method of indiscriminately requesting a refusal if the member is not recognized as an attendee only by applying for refusal.
Minister Chu attached a written opinion against the court decision of the legal representative of the Ministry of Justice. The legal representative can be considered that the court’s interpretation of the rejection decision is theoretically possible, but this is only one possible interpretation, and ultimately Insisted that it seemed to be subject to judgment.
– .
