Bad news is coming for many workers who risk having to deal with a poorer paycheck. Let’s go into the details and see what’s going on.
The work ennobles man, offering the possibility of drawing on that source of income necessary to be able to meet the various daily expenses. At the same time, it cannot be denied how often it is also a source of problems, due to the various commitments and deadlines to be respected. If all this were not enough, things do not always go as hoped and in some cases you can find yourself having to deal with unpleasant surprises.
All workers who risk having one know this well poorest paycheck than usual, due to lack of funds to pay the quarantines. An alarm, the one launched by INPS, which did not go unnoticed, with many who fear the possible consequences. So let’s go into the details and see what’s going on.
Paycheck, bad news coming: there is no money to pay for the quarantine
Across the message n ° 2842 of 6 August of the INPS, the social security institution has announced that the quarantine will not be paid for the events that occurred during 2021, but only for those of 2020, as no new resources have been allocated. News, that of lack of money to pay for the quarantine, which has certainly not gone unnoticed, especially considering that it forces those who cannot work remotely to stay for a certain period of time without salary and without contributions.
There are many concerns about this among trade unions and businesses. CGIL, CISL and UIL, for example, are calling for a rule that restores funding, as they are also at risk salary cuts. Furthermore, as Unimpresa points out, companies could find themselves having to deal with double damage. On the one hand, the difficult management of absences, on the other hand the coverage of the indemnity that is no longer paid by INPS.
READ ALSO >>> Anti-Covid vaccine, a turnover worth billions: who earns the most
The denunciation of an enterprise
“If the companies do not cover the Inps benefits, there will be a they pay between 600 and 700 euros in their paychecks, on average, for 10 days of absence“, He in fact highlighted One company, as can be seen from a press release published on its website.
For businesses “in any case, it would be a question of dealing with damage, which could be double: managing the absence of personnel, which in the event of business infections could even be halved, therefore with consequences on company operations, and, at the same time, suffer a weight for any compensation for “gaps” in wages of employees“.
–
