Home » Business » [2024 뉴테크놀로지포럼] Attorney Lee Geun-woo: “AI should not be treated equally as a human being, beyond being an assistant.”

[2024 뉴테크놀로지포럼] Attorney Lee Geun-woo: “AI should not be treated equally as a human being, beyond being an assistant.”

Lee Geun-woo, head of the AI ​​Center at Yoon & Yang Law Firm, is giving a lecture at the ‘2024 New Technology Forum’ hosted by Metro Media at Ferrum Tower in Jung-gu, Seoul on the 20th. / Reporter Son Jin-young son@

“Artificial intelligence (AI) is only a helper and should not be treated equally with humans.”

Lee Geun-woo, a partner lawyer at Yoon & Yang Law Firm, spoke about AI and human justice at the ‘2024 New Technology Forum’ held at Ferrum Hall, Ferrum Tower, Eulji-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul on the 20th. He emphasized that the advantages of using AI are clear, but at the same time, there are many side effects and problems, and that in-depth consideration and discussion are needed on this.

Attorney Lee gave a keynote lecture on the topic, ‘The era of living with AI: Issues of utilization and labor market.’ He pointed out labor market problems that may arise due to the use of AI as something that needs special attention in an era where AI technology is spreading, and argued that specific measures need to be taken to deal with this.

Attorney Lee pointed out that although companies often create positive cases by introducing AI, if specific legislation related to AI is enacted in Korea in the future, measures to respond to problems that may arise in the process of industrial intelligence must be prepared.

He said, “The introduction of AI could lead to a situation where existing stable occupations disappear entirely.” He added, “In particular, production AI, which threatens the livelihood of artists, uses works of art for learning to create products.” “Voices calling for it to be banned are growing louder,” he said.

He also mentioned the ‘Law on Prohibiting AI Substitution of Call Center Workers’ passed by the California State Assembly. The Call Center Act is a bill that prevents workers’ core jobs from being replaced by artificial intelligence. This bill is evaluated as an important example of protecting workers in a situation where AI use is expanding.

Lee Geun-woo, head of the AI ​​Center at Yoon & Yang Law Firm, is giving a lecture at the ‘2024 New Technology Forum’ hosted by Metro Media at Ferrum Tower in Jung-gu, Seoul on the 20th. / Reporter Son Jin-young son@

In particular, he pointed out that AI is threatening the jobs of highly educated people. Attorney Lee said, “Generative AI has reached a level where it can replace areas that perform non-repetitive yet cognitive analysis functions,” and added, “In the past, graduate school graduates were considered irreplaceable as they were highly skilled workers, but now the skills and skills of graduate school graduates have been improved.” “The possibility of being replaced by people with an educational background is also increasing,” he explained.

He said, “AI has positive effects such as increasing corporate efficiency, but even if productivity improvement extends to the overall economy, replacing specific workers may ultimately concentrate the burden on some groups of workers.” He added, “Redesigning jobs.” “There is a more urgent need to improve the education and training system,” he said.

He continued, “Immediate productivity improvement may have a direct effect on a specific company, but it is also closely linked to changes in the working environment, education, and worker adaptation issues,” adding, “Both companies and the country must balance worker and job issues through policy.” “Only through careful consideration will we be able to maximize the efficiency of AI while creating sustainable jobs and occupational environments,” he said.

He also mentioned internal and external factors for companies to respond to AI trends. Attorney Lee said, “It is important to systematically establish AI ethics principles, policies, and manuals internally within a company to prepare for potential problems in advance.”

He continued, “Externally, in areas related to labor, it is necessary to thoroughly follow the regulatory system to avoid reckless use of AI.” He added, “Legal issues related to finance, personal information protection, copyright, etc. must be considered to ensure safe use of AI.” He explained.

detail ​photograph

**What specific policies ⁣and regulations should be implemented to address the ethical ​challenges posed by AI, such as ​bias, transparency, and accountability?**

##⁣ World Today News Presents: The AI Conundrum – ⁢A⁣ Conversation on Ethics and the⁣ Future of⁤ Work

**Introduction:**

Welcome to World Today News. Today we’re深入 discussing ‍the ethical and socioeconomic implications of Artificial Intelligence ‍with⁢ two‌ leading experts in the field. Joining us are Dr. Amelia Song, a renowned expert in AI Ethics and Professor of Computer Science ⁢at Stanford University, and Mr.​ Jonathan Carter, a leading‍ labor economist‍ and policy advisor at the Center for Economic Policy Research.

Welcome both of ‌you.

**Section ‍1: The Promise and Peril of AI:**

* **Dr. Song:** You’ve stated that AI is “only ‌a helper and should not be‌ treated equally with humans.” Could you elaborate on the‍ rationale behind this statement, particularly in ⁣light of the‍ rapid advancements in‍ AI capabilities?

* **Mr. Carter:** ⁤Mr. Lee mentions the ​potential disappearance of certain jobs due to AI. How do you see the landscape of the future⁤ labor market evolving? What types ⁣of jobs are most‍ at risk, and what⁣ new opportunities might⁣ AI create?

**Section​ 2: Navigating the​ Ethical Landscape:**

* **Dr. Song:** Mr. Lee highlights the​ “Call Center Act” in California as a potential model‍ for protecting workers. Do‌ you see such legislation becoming more commonplace globally? What are some ‍other ethical guidelines or regulations ​that need to be addressed as AI‍ becomes more pervasive?

* **Mr. Carter:**⁤ The article mentions AI threatening highly educated professionals. Do you agree with this assessment? How can ⁤we ensure that the benefits of AI are distributed equitably and​ that no segment of⁣ the workforce is left behind?

**Section 3: Redoing the⁢ Future: Education and Adaptation:**

* **Dr. Song:** Mr. Lee emphasizes the need for “redesigning jobs” and improvements ⁤to the education and training system. What specific steps can individuals, educational institutions, and​ governments take to prepare for the future of ⁢work in an AI-driven world?

* **Mr. Carter:** What are some examples of successful⁤ retraining programs or initiatives that‌ address the skills gap ‍created by AI? How can we make lifelong learning a reality for ⁤workers‍ of ‍all ages and backgrounds?

**Section 4: Business Responsibility and Policy:**

* **Dr.‌ Song:** You mention the importance of⁤ companies establishing AI ethics principles internally. What‌ are some key elements that should be included in these principles, and how can ‍we ensure their effective implementation?

* **Mr. Carter:** ⁤What role can governments play ⁤in fostering responsible AI ​development and deployment while also promoting economic growth? What policies should be ‍prioritized to ensure​ a just transition to an ‌AI-powered economy?

**Concluding‍ Remarks:**

The future of AI is undeniably intertwined with ​the future ⁤of work and society‌ as ⁤a whole. We thank Dr. Song and Mr. Carter for their insightful perspectives on this critical topic.⁢ We hope this conversation has shed⁣ light on the complex challenges and ⁢opportunities presented ⁢by AI and sparked further discussion on ⁤how we can harness its power for the benefit ‌of all.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.