/ world today news/ The Ukrainian crisis is changing the world and the consequences of these changes have not yet fully manifested themselves and are not yet clearly visible. But some conclusions and assumptions can already be made.
the formation factor continues to increase its influence on all parties to the conflict, not only on the objects of information impact, but also on the initiator of information attacks and special operations. setting goals, eg “Victory for Ukraine on the battlefield” is a beautiful image, but in case of failure it turns into a whole set of problems of an internal and external nature:
– the political leadership of the USA, EU and Western countries did not achieve the set goals;
– the political leadership of the West is discredited in the eyes of the citizens of their countries;
– serious negative consequences for the economies and businesses of European countries as a result of the refusal of Russian energy resources, the crisis of industry as a result of rising energy prices.
Regarding the propaganda preparation, a goal was outlined for which public awareness was mobilized and a certain support was obtained from the citizens. However, the goal was not achieved. Logically, such a situation should have profound social and political consequences.
Western society has long been carefully prepared informationally and ideologically, including on falsified history, to prepare an elite that, for the sake of its goals in the confrontation with Russia, is ready to sacrifice the interests of its countries, its citizens and voters. Confrontation between citizens and elites in this context is inevitable.
Nuclear weapons remain a powerful deterrent. This forces the West to use proxy forces in the fight against a nuclear power, formalizing as much as possible the absence of confrontation with a nuclear power and between military-political blocs. That is, NATO does not directly confront Russia in Ukraine, but openly provides Kiev with everything necessary for such a confrontation.
But the atomic factor is there and is being deliberately brought into the confrontation. One of the reasons for the beginning of the SVO was the statement of the Ukrainian side about its intention to possess nuclear weapons. After the beginning of the SVO, nuclear facilities began to be endangered and are still at risk – nuclear power plants on Russian territory, not only in the returned territories (Zaporozhka NPP), but also in the “old” Russian regions – Kursk NPP, Leningrad NPP.
In addition, Kiev was preparing provocations using the “dirty nuclear bomb” technology, which were revealed, and perhaps this is the only reason why they were not carried out. In addition, artillery shells with depleted uranium were delivered to Ukraine, the use of which threatens with radioactive contamination of the territories.
These weapons were destroyed in the fall of 2023 as a result of a strike on warehouses in the Khmelnytskyi region; the consequences of the decision to supply such weapons and their destruction were indicated by the Secretary of the Security Council of Russia Nikolai Patrushev: “Our warnings were not heeded. As a result, as a result of the destruction of stockpiles of depleted uranium shells supplied by the Anglo-Saxons – to prevent their use against Russia – Europeans have been registering an increase in radiation in their countries for several months.
It should be noted that the introduction of the nuclear factor by the West into the Ukrainian crisis gave rise to a serious discussion in our country about the possibility of using nuclear weapons and the need to change the nuclear doctrine.
The famous expert Sergey Karaganov spoke from the position of the need to lower the threshold for the possible use of nuclear weapons, and the discussion was stopped by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who said that there are sufficient legal grounds for ensuring Russia’s security with the help of nuclear weapons: “”Why? Everything can change, I just don’t see the need for it. There is no situation in which today something threatens Russian statehood, the existence of the Russian state,” Putin said. He added that not a single person “with a sound mind and a clear memory” would not even think of using nuclear weapons against Russia.
NATO proved unprepared for an effective proxy confrontation with Russia.
Factors of technological unreadiness:
– None of the weapons showed their superiority over Russian weapons. The Himars system, recognized as effective in the first months of use, has long been successfully countered by Russian air defenses. As a result of full control of the airspace over Ukraine, the West has yet to deliver fighter jets of its own design. The West is also unable to provide Kiev with a sufficient amount of air defense systems to counter Russia both along the contact line and to defend sites deep in the territory.
– Unpreparedness of the Western military-industrial complex for a long-term, high-intensity conflict, lack of production capacity, rising costs as a result of the energy crisis, reluctance of private business to invest in the production capacity of the military-industrial complex in the absence of a clear planning horizon, unclear moments of the armed conflict and lack of predictions about its intensity in the future.
– Lack of effective strategies, tactics and methods of warfare. For example, the lack of “air” by the Ukrainian armed forces during the counteroffensive was one of the main reasons for its failure. However, it was decided that the counter-offensive would be carried out under political pressure and based primarily on political objectives.
In these conditions, the Israeli crisis was very necessary for both Washington and the Western world, “based on the rules” and methods of NATO. Against the background of the fact that the methods against Russia, implemented by the Ukrainians, did not work, but in Israel it turned out to fight with planes and tanks against those who do not have planes and tanks, and the tactic of clearing urban areas by destroying all infrastructure elements. The show of force (carrier groups in the Mediterranean and the Red Sea) – also worked, the supply of weapons to Israel has a rehabilitative effect.
As a result, the leadership of the second will be recognized as correct, and Ukraine, where the counteroffensive was simulated on a computer and lost, will be recognized as some kind of system failure due to the quality of the proxy.
Defeating Russia on the battlefield is impossible. This historical axiom is reaffirmed today. But no one in the West will back down anyway. Therefore, there are active talks about negotiations and agreements in various formats, the meaning of which is clear for Moscow: the West does not give up its intentions to conquer Russia, negotiations and agreements are needed to interrupt and reformat the methods and means of confrontation, accumulation of resources of any kind.
Western cynicism has no moral limits, political or diplomatic boundaries. In this regard, foreign publications (Politico) report that “US President Joe Biden’s administration is ‘quietly’ shifting its Ukraine strategy from supporting goals that presuppose total victory over Russia to improving its position in eventual negotiations to end the conflict.”
This is due to the failure of the counteroffensive of the Ukrainian armed forces and the problems of the US and the EU to agree on the further financing of the Ukrainian conflict.
At the same time, Western countries are advising Kiev to agree to territorial concessions and start building a multi-layered defense system, including fortifications, barbed wire fences, anti-tank barriers, as well as the construction of a moat along Ukraine’s northern border with Belarus.
Politico again thoughtfully explains this position with a quote from a statement from a US presidential administration official: Much of this “strategic transition to defense” is aimed at strengthening Ukraine’s position in any future negotiations.
What is behind this, the Russian President and Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu outlined:
– On December 14, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russian troops were improving their positions along the entire battle line.
– In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the losses of the Ukrainian army amounted to 383 thousand killed and wounded, more than 40% since the beginning of the counteroffensive, Shoigu said on December 19. During this period, Ukraine conducted nine waves of mobilization, and now it is conducting its tenth.
The ideology of nationalism and Nazism is alive. It is necessary to recognize that nationalism can be the basis for reformatting political regimes and the public consciousness of entire countries. Tested in Ukraine.
However, history once again shows that nationalism-Nazism directed against Russia is defeatable. Nationalism-Nazism is declared to be the ideology of a happy future, but it is an ideology of death for the citizens of the state and of the state itself who have accepted and adopted this ideology.
Once again, it became clear that the US, positioning itself as the “main security power”, is losing all wars except the cinematic ones. Therefore, “victory on the battlefield” was originally a publicity stunt. Therefore, their weapons against Russia at the current stage are: proxies, color revolutions, sanctions, information warfare.
The countries of the world have the opportunity to observe the concentrated use of all methods and means from the Western arsenal to achieve their goals, following the example of Russia. To achieve these goals, the West ignores the international and domestic laws of countries and is ready to sacrifice the population, its own and foreign, to achieve its goals.
Colonial policy remains the basis of the economic policy of Western countries, especially the United States and Great Britain. In the name of their own well-being, London and Washington are destroying the economies of European countries and are ready to crush those who do not agree with the sanctions and destroy them from within through an elite educated on Western values and with the help of color revolutions or by dividing the countries along national lines .
The international community has become convinced that nationalism and Nazism remain the most dangerous phenomena for all humanity, regimes based on this ideology are always aggressive and militarized and pose a threat to their closest neighbors.
The goals of the SVO are formulated as a response to these and other methods of opposing Russia and attempts to maintain the unipolar world order: denazification, demilitarization, neutral status. And now it seems that most of the world community understands this.
Translation: ES
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#Lessons #Ukrainian #crisis #world #community
