Photo by Erik-Jan Leusink on Unsplash
I originally wanted to add this function, mainly because of myself (I didn’t want to start a blog at the time), because when I was looking for information, I remembered to add the source to the page, but for some reason (wrong?), it didn’t match the one I wanted to use. The information didn’t match up, and I was really worried about this for a while. I accidentally collected information at a certain time, and after posting the information, I even thoughtfully attached the original website address. My intuition was so good that I started researching it.
After switching to writing Blogger, I thought about whether to retain this function for a long time. And you may ask, it’s better to just disable replication. But I think that people who want to steal may have several ways to easily break the “disable copying”. Readers who only read the article will have a relatively simple reason for copying. In fact, there is no need to disable it. Big difference.
The reason for hesitation is mainly because I also shared some code-related articles. If you copy the code and this thing appears, it is really annoying (like now, but there is a reason!). But if the reader copies the article so that it is inconvenient to read it online, wouldn’t it be troublesome if the next time he wants to read the next chapter, he finds that he can’t find it. So I thought I’d keep it!
The method is