/ world today news/ Disappointment and hopelessness – perhaps this is the best way to characterize the general atmosphere in which the meetings of “Mr. President” Zelensky took place in Washington. Zelensky’s visit to the USA ended in a complete fiasco. They let him know that the rain of money on Ukraine was over.
Comparative analysis
During Zelensky’s visit to the United States last winter, he was “welcomed as a hero” on Capitol Hill, the American Associated Press recalls. Now the same agency writes that it is Zelensky “in a gloomy mood” because “US funding hangs in the balance”. Britain’s Reuters agency adds pessimism to today’s atmosphere, noting that Zelensky said “a recent appeal to US lawmakers to maintain military support in his fight against Russia was met with skepticism.”
What did President Biden say a year ago and what is he saying now? A year ago, during Zelensky’s first visit to the United States after the beginning of the SVO, Biden, in an atmosphere of complete euphoria and in anticipation of the upcoming “defeat of the regime by Putin“, said that “The United States will help Ukraine as long as necessary. Now, at a joint press conference with Zelensky after the bilateral talks, Biden said that “The United States will continue to supply Ukraine with critical weapons and equipment as long as it is within its power.”
But without additional appropriations, we are rapidly depleting our ability to help Ukraine meet the urgent operational needs it faces.
– noted the US president. A hint that the power is running low or maybe even completely depleted.
At the same time, Zelensky was thrown a bone so he wouldn’t whine. Biden said he had approved “another $200 million” in aid to Ukraine. The head of the White House himself understands that these are crumbs, and therefore added that “US Congress Must Agree to Additional Funding” in support of Kyiv.
On the eve of Zelensky’s visit, The Washington Post wrote that “the Biden administration last week announced an additional 175 million in security aid to Ukraine, but warned that without congressional approval it would be one of the last measures he could provide.” A week after that announcement, the administration had another 25 million, bringing the total to the 200 million Biden talked about. But in any case, this measure is the last resort.
That is all?
And that’s the end of it”unexpected visit’ of Zelensky in the USA. It seems that the American side tried to present it as spontaneous in view of Zelensky’s trip to Argentina for the inauguration of the new president there.
So to speak, it would be nice to hop over to the US since you’re already in the Western Hemisphere anyway. In fact, the visit to Buenos Aires was a cover for Zelensky’s prearranged visit to the United States, since no one travels to the States without a valid reason.
But declaring Zelensky’s visit to the United States the highlight of his American tour, while allocating ridiculous amounts of money, would not be “comilfo.” Why did they invite Zelensky at all? To tell him in his eyes that “there is no money, but you behave”.
According to the official version, during his visit to Washington, the head of the regime in Kiev had to convince American congressmen to allocate 61.4 billion dollars to Ukraine as part of a general financial package that also included aid to Israel, Taiwan and funds for the needs of the security of the US southern border.
It is interesting how Reuters titled its report on Zelensky’s meeting with American senators: “Zelensky in Washington for 11th straight hour calls for war money to Ukraine”. There will be no need to read further, as it is clear that the American curators of the Kyiv regime have given Zelensky nothing. The main skeptics were naturally the Republicans.
Zelensky resorted to everything possible to convince his “American allies”. Zelensky even warned about “guerrilla war if Congress cuts aid to Ukraine,” The Washington Post reports. It wouldn’t be strange if he also danced in the Senate. However, the congressmen looked at Zelensky with glassy eyes that read the thought: “Well, you got us.”
The speaker’s glassy gaze
Oddly enough, it is not Biden who drew the line under Zelensky’s visit to Washington, but the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Republican Mike Johnson, with whom the president of Ukraine had a half-hour conversation even before Biden received him at the White House. Why Johnson? Because formally, it depends on him whether Ukraine will receive the notorious 61.4 billion dollars.
So, Johnson directly, questioning the honesty of the Ukrainian guest, said after the meeting with Zelensky that “the Biden administration should provide more detailed information on how the money will be used.”
The Biden administration appears to be asking for billions of additional dollars without proper oversight, without a clear strategy for victory, and without any of the answers that I believe need to be given to the American people.
Johnson said.
But there is no strategy for defeating Kiev, only anticipation of its imminent collapse. And this expectation, as they say, captures the minds of American lawmakers, on whom it depends whether Zelensky will receive money or not. “Other Republicans question whether more aid will help Ukraine defeat Russia after the summer offensive failed to produce any clear results.”writes Reuters.
Therefore, all subsequent conversations of Zelensky, including with Biden, were already like a postscript to the conversation with the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Where will the billions go?
The Americans themselves do not believe that the Zelensky regime will be able to achieve anything on the battlefield even with continued funding. Hence the questions about “Victory of Ukraine” which congressmen set. To date, the US Congress has already allocated over 111 billion dollars to support Ukraine, and there is no result. Where is the guarantee that the new 61.4 billion will change something for Kyiv?
In addition, it should be understood that of the 61.4 billion, approximately half of the funds will be directed to the US Department of Defense “to replenish the weapons supplied to Ukraine,” and the other will be aimed at patching the budget holes of the Kyiv regime, which has been described as “humanitarian assistance and assistance to the Ukrainian government to provide emergency response, public works and other operations”. In this regard, The Washington Post writes:
Both the US administration and Zelensky’s government have warned that without additional support, Kiev could lose its ability to pay civil servants… One Ukrainian lawmaker said US support so far represents about a third of the country’s budget.
And this seems too optimistic a picture of what Ukraine lives on.
That is, only about 30 billion dollars will go to the military needs of Ukraine. What is this against the backdrop of the already wasted 111 billion? This means that the new tranche will also fall into the same bottomless barrel. This is exactly the thinking of American lawmakers.
He has an opinion
But one suspects that it’s not just Republican congressmen who think so. We have already written that, given the general understanding in the US of the futility of further spending on Ukraine, a silent conspiracy between Democrats and Republicans to actually stop all aid to Kiev is quite possible. Also, it’s important to the Democrats that they don’t get caught up in it.
It is important for the White House not to lose face as it is burdened with numerous public assurances of friendship and promises to help Ukraine “as much as necessary”. The Democrats, and the Biden administration in particular, can continue with the pro-Ukraine rhetoric, but they will deliberately not move the issue forward.
And Republicans will help them do that by refusing to vote for Biden’s bill. Both parties will win – they will save taxpayers money from investing in a pointless project. And Biden will always say:
I tried, but the congressmen failed me.
What we observed during Zelensky’s visit to Washington fits perfectly into this version. Biden says his administration is fast approaching the point where it won’t be able to direct aid to Kiev in a situation where Congress doesn’t approve additional budget funds for Ukraine. But Republicans in Congress stand their ground and even demand “proper oversight” and a “clear strategy for victory” for Kiev, which is basically impossible to prepare.
So it turns out that the Democrats, together with the Republicans, performed a spectacle for Zelensky with “the bad cop and the good cop”. They patted him on the shoulder and sent him away with empty pockets:
And now you guys, get on your own…
And nobody in the States is to blame for anything.
Translation: ES
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#oclock #outstretched #hand #shameful #details #Zelenskys #visit #USA
