Home » News » [사회]Yoon Seok-yeol’s side “It’s just an unfair disciplinary response…

[사회]Yoon Seok-yeol’s side “It’s just an unfair disciplinary response…

Attorneys on the Korean side continue to discuss, including submitting additional documents
Yun Suk-yeol, it is still undecided whether it will appear directly in the interrogation.
The 尹 side, the disciplinary committee’s policy to actively insist on illegality and injustice

[앵커]

Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol repeatedly stressed that the lawsuit targets the president’s’disposition’, but the defendant is the Minister of Justice.

He drew the line that it was political to drive the passport into a defense against the president.

Reporter Park Seo-kyung reports.

[기자]

Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol’s lawyers, who are about to be interrogated on the 22nd to suspend the enforcement of the disciplinary effect, continued discussions on the weekend to submit additional documents.

It is expected that the final decision will be made on the morning of the day or the day before whether President Yun will appear in person for the court hearing.

It has been reported that Yoon left most of the lawsuits with lawyers and only received reports.

In a call with YTN, Mr. Yoon’s defense attorney expressed concern that the politicians viewed the lawsuit as a protest against the president.

‘Protestant’ refers to opposing legitimate instructions, but this discipline is not just because it has a procedural problem in itself.

He also explained that it is a lawsuit against the presidential disposition, but not against the President, and that the defendant is also the Minister of Justice, not the President.

It has repeatedly emphasized that the purpose of responding legally is to argue that the disciplinary procedure pushed by Minister Chu Mi-ae is unfair.

In the previous interrogation on the suspension of the exclusion of duties, President Yoon, who stated that there were no procedures such as the disciplinary committee, is planning to actively highlight the illegality and injustice of the disciplinary committee.

Although it has gone through the procedures stipulated by the law, it is actually only in shape.

I didn’t think it was meant to give a legitimacy for disciplinary action because it was formal.

At the same time, we plan to argue that the composition of the disciplinary committee was biased and that the right to defend was not properly guaranteed, and even expectations for the proper procedure were broken.

With the unprecedented disciplinary action of the incumbent prosecutor general and the confrontation between the president and the president, attention is focused on the court’s decision to decide whether to return to the president.

This is YTN Park Seo-kyung.

※’Your report becomes news’ YTN awaits your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]

– .

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.